FactPile

Dark Light
@ Belisaurius For once, I agree with you. …

Comment posted on The Tau Vs The Covenant by Kenny C.

@ Belisaurius

For once, I agree with you.

Kenny C. also commented

  • @ Tom

    Well… that’s FactPile and thats Warhammer 40,000 – The most brutal and violent fictional universes ever conceived.

  • @ Tom

    All of this has been considered and the outcome is the same… Tau win.

  • @ i dunno

    ” since when was the greater knarlock a vehicle? ” -Since Dawn of War Dark Crusade, bitch.

  • @ i dunno

    ” the ONLY way the covenant can win would be to drop thousands of elites from orbit right on top of the tau ” – Which might be difficult considering the Covenant’s current political landscape.

    ” vehicles: the tau have hover tanks, as do the covies. the tau have f*cking railguns mounted on their tanks, the covenant have plasma mortars, which are ok ” – You forgot the kick ass battle suits… and the Greater Knarloc.

    ” the tau are terrible at naval combat, ” – Terrible? They were outnumbered for Christ sakes and the fact that they could even stand against an Imperial Fleet makes them vastly superior to the Covenant’s fleets.

    ” of course, the kroot arent too shabby as far as melee goes. ” – Believe me, they would beat the shit of the Covenant if it went Hand to hand. The Kroot have been able to go toe to toe with the Orks, which is quite a feat considering the capablity of the average ork to smash heads around.

  • @ the_man_with_the_Answers

    No…. just no.

Recent comments by Kenny C.

  • Imperial Guard Vs Terran Marines
    ” You are, in a nutshell, just crying which is pretty pathetic. ”

    - Nope – I simply showed that Marines are not all re-cond. cons and that your “comparison” was anything but. Seriously…. I’ve listed the above two items several times….. the least you could do is recognize another’s stated target……. when he has literally stated his issues….. mutiple times.

    ” Do you even own caves of ice? There was only one bolter turret on top a chimera, so assuming it was the cause of all the 10 orks becoming piles of steaming goo is dumb. ”

    - Why? With an adequate rate of fire and the fact I’ve read several novels of man-sized objects only requiring a single “bolt” to tear in half. Factor in sustained fire, a turret mount, and possibly even a large magazine……. there’s plenty of issues to take up when we factor in a bolter. Oh and yes. I own Caves of Ice. Stupid Necrons attacking underground, while a Gargant stomps the top.

    ” see which one is the superior weapon in terms of destructive capabilities. ”

    - What. A. Fail. You posted a comparison between the lasgun adn several other weapons. Without even citing a SINGLE account of the C-14 Impaler you went ahead and used the wiki account without even recounting accounts of its actual use. The wiki article only accounts for some of its specs (A real bare bones affair in every sense of the word….. it doesn’t even list the length of the 8mm spike). That was not a comparison. It was simply you reciting what you copied off another author and a wiki (without even listing a single canon account of the C-14) and saying “lolz owned.” For you to even attempt to call that a true comparison or even an amatuer attempt as that would require you to cite actual canon accounts….. not the “infallible” wiki page that has the absolute mininum amount of info about the C-14. It was just fail in motion.

    ” You went off topic and started bitching about nothing. ”

    - No, I “bitched” about your apparent inability to do basic research and do a comparison based on something more than a internet article site that is infamous on this site for its bareness and utter fallacies – due to it being editable to almost anyone. Very different thing, my boy. I’m correcting you on things that are rather common sense and you only true retort is to cry “bitch.” Which has become a frequent battle cry of my opponents since……… they have really nothing to say against me and I’m pretty much right all the time. Being reduced for the pathetic post they post, their only true recourse it to announce that I’m bing too “mean” or merely “bitching.” This is a debate site where we fight with facts and truths. If you don’t like the fact you will be shown for a fool for using lies and errors…… ummm….. do you realize where you are?

    Arguing against me for pointing out flaws on a DEBATE site is like saying I’m not playing fair on a multiplayer game when I “kill” you – doesn’t make fucking sense.

    ” Oh it’s not the spelling and grammar I’m getting on you about, it’s the fact you spelled khorne wrong. How the fuck does a fan manage that? Any other word I would have just called it a typo, but spelling that particular one wrong screams that you don’t know jack shit about 40k. ”

    - So is not being able to capatilize “ig.” I guess that means that there are multiple Imperial Guard as its not a pronoun. And for you to say I don’t know anything about 40k….. seriously…… that proves you’re a new fish more than anything else that is wrong with your posts.

    ” I admit I do have problems making a comparison to a point where a child can understand it ”

    -That would require the ability to make a comparison in the first place….. which is not apparent at the moment considering…… well…. you really didn’t compare anything beyond some spec on a wiki page….. and several accounts of many diiferent weapons (all copied from another beforehand of course). Thats like comparing The FN-FAL and the AK-47, when I give you the inventor, an operator, and the manual on the AK-47 and then tell you what rounds the FN-FAL fire (width only by the way) and around how fast the round travels…..the rate of fire and how far it can penetrate “steel” plating (the quote is in question because may suppose that it is in fact refering to neo-steel).

    ” Who was it that even went off topic about some utter bullshit? ”

    - We didn’t go off topic – we’re on topic and debating about the status of Terran Marines and your inability to make comparisons in relation to trying to compare the lasgun and the C-14 Impaler Gauss Rifle. Off topic is if we started to debate Killzone weapons……. but we’re not…… please don’t tell me I really have to give another english lesson on this site….. I’ve given enough already.

    ” Who was the first person to start crying like a bitch over nothing?”

    - You actually, considering I highlighted errors on your post concerning FACTS on a DEBATE site. You, in turn, blew your top, actually started the insulting game and refering to me with profanity. The fact you did this in response to a post that highlighted the on-topic errors with your fualty comparisons and supposed “facts,” actually makes you the bitchee.

    Please continue flinging your arms about though fisher, it only results in more discussion about you in the noob thread in FTP. We like new fish here that fail utterly.

  • Recap – 9.5.2010
    Vanquish is amazing….. and makes MC seem like an old man with crutchs.
  • Imperial Guard Vs Terran Marines
    ” I did dipshit. I was implying, probably correctly I might add, that you didn’t read the whole post. ”

    - Then you would be wrong then. Not to mention the fact its hard to really get a calc from said occasion when said bolter fire could be the real reason for the Orks to end up as they did and said occasion occured in “seconds”. He does give a nice round average output, but its hardly the end all be all.

    “But the rough comparison, I did.”

    - Bullshit – what you did was -

    ” Page 42; Vraksian Renegade Militiaman:
    “This particular autogun is an Agrpinaa pattern, type III. It fires a long .825 calibre round, on either single shot, semi-automatic and fully automatic, with a cyclic rate of fire of 650 rounds per minute with a muzzle velocity of 820 metres per second. It takes both a 20 and a 30 round box magazine”
    This is the hand held rifle of a backwater militia, which fires 20mm rounds at a muzzle velocity just *barely* comparable to that of a the M16.”

    So I see the weaponry of the imperial guard definitely having an edge over the terran infantry weapons. Here is a quote from the sc2 wiki, about terran rifles.http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/C-14_rifle

    “In use by 2478,[2] the C-14 fires hypersonic 8 mm armor-piercing metal “spikes”[3][1] which can penetrate up to two inches of steel plating.[4]
    The Impaler is fully automatic with a fire rate of 30 rounds per second[5], although fully automatic fire is discouraged under most circumstances. A capacitor system is used to fire the weapon in short bursts, conserving ammunition and minimizing power requirements.[1]”

    Yeah I’m more than sure Imperial guardsmen weaponry trumps terran infantry gear.”

    - THAT is NOT a comparison. That was you quoting L-W and a wiki and going “golly gee – IG stomp.” You gave no reasoning nor did you even attempt to expand beyond what has already basically been handed you by other authors….. you did nothing. Absolutely nothing.

    ” To my knowledge every single one of the marine raynors raiders were convicts. I’m not trying to deflect anything I was simply asking for you to stop crying like a bitch and give the correct con to enlisted man ratio in the terran marines. ”

    - fisherking, utterly devoid of any civilised retort, has to resort to an often used tactic used against Kenny C. – that he is merely bitching. Considering that the issue in hand determines the mental capacity and therefore combat flexibility of an entire army and said fisherking made the preposterious claim that all Marines were “brain dead convits,” his claim is clearly bullshit. fisherking, taking offense to being shown for being a fool for making such a claim, challenges back to give the exact ratio. Such attempt is clearly nothing more that an attempt to lay away blame from him when he already knows, or should know, that the ratio is not known. But that gives him little heed to say “wow all conz.”

    ” To my knowledge every single one of the marine raynors raiders were convicts.”

    - According to what? Surely you must have a source for such a claim?

    ” I never said you weren’t a 40k fan, I said you don’t know shit about 40k.”

    - Fan = knowing about said series. Are you seriously suggesting I can be a fan of something I have no knowledge of? If you are….. damn….. you need more help than I thought.

    ” And you even spelled “khorne” wrong to. Who the fuck is khrone? Thanks for confirming my suspicions.”

    - You want to make arguments with matters of grammar and spelling mistakes? I could cite that you having the annoying tendency of a third grader of not capatalising pronouns…. but hey – only a desperate new fish takes up a little problem concerning grammar and spelling…. oh wait…..

    “I mean it’s only fitting, you both seem to have equal mental capabilities.”

    - See comment above, your “attempt” at comparisons, and your “marines are all convicts” fallacy.

    ” Oh yeah because reading a post full of bitching and crying and having to reply to that piece of shit makes me feel like my dignity has been taken from me. ”

    - Considering I succesfully called you out on the marines are convicts, your inability to make a real comparison, and your pention to respond in foul langauage befitting a middle schooler…… ummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm…. yeah actually. No thanks are required.

    ” Hey Kenny C. do everyone a favor and pull your head out your ass.”

    - That would require you to prove that my head was indeed up my ass. I doubt you have conclusive proof of that, when you have problems making comparisons beyond simply quoting two sources and not expanding beyond that.

    @ Admin – I know that you have a thing about flamers of late…. so delete away if you most. Though I might suggest researching who first used profanity to decribe their opponent in this case.

  • Imperial Guard Vs Terran Marines
    ” For one, the cinematic I linked to, they basically just moved in a large mob toward wherever the fuck they were going to, which is tactically retarded. There reaction to the zerg attack later is adds on to the what I previously stated. Oh and uh, no one disproved that they display tactics so i’m right by default. ”

    - The fact the game never came out and therefore the actions within are not actual published canon? And the fact that was a single commander in a single action, said commander being refered to as an “idiot” by other rank and file marines (which is impossible for re-con marines by the way)? And I can literally outcite you by several magnitudes to show that your stance is practically retarded?

    ” The first example, if you read it in it’s entirety ”

    - Which you should have posted in the first place…..

    ” A person looks at what a lasgun can do in some 40k canon media then estimate how much power it would have taken to do said example.”

    - Which YOU didn’t do.

    ” Oh okay since you’re such a smartass how about you enlighten me to the actual amounts of cons that make up terran marines instead of bitching. ”

    - There are no published rates or amounts to my knowledge. But that doesn’t give you a blank check to say – “Lolz – all conz” when I can literally cite the latest game to prove your stance bullshit. Trying to deflect you made a mistake with the known fact we don’t know the percentile of con to enlisted men in the Marine Corps? For shame fisher….. for shame.

    Not to mention…… you never really explained how the lasgun is more powerful than the Gauss rifle….. you basically just said “duh – common sense!” You made no move to estimate the power of the C-14 Gauss Rifle nor tried to do any sort of rough comparison. You basically breast feed off of L-W’s work for entire posts and then pointed at it and said “Woowzer.”

    ” You seem like you don’t know jack shit about 40k. ”

    - So ends another failed response to me…. yet another attempt among the “new fish” to show me up. And the upon quoted statement is a really good example of you how new he is. Me? A 40k fan? NAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWW!……….. I must have named one of my Canes after Khrone for no clear reason at all.

    Fisher – you seem to have problems with citing your sources or even developing your ideas in a clear, concise manner. A good way to improve would be to cite where you get information and by copying it (yes – I know it un-mans you to have to rely on others work to help you out in debate, but do it for me) word for word. In fact, given that your response cleared up some of your post’s problems clearly highlights how much you needed to lean on L-W’s previous work to even come up with a counter-response. One that was littered with comebacks I find more appropriate for middle school fight between two imbred children, with a speech disorder.

    Admin – feel free to delete this post if you want. Or give me a good talking to if you feel the need to curtail me. I know many of our resident ‘pilers don’t like my caustic responses and often feel a bit un-manned after I beat them with a metaphorical hammer for them posting utter foolishness. So do what you will.

  • Recap – 9.5.2010
    ” Mainly because I don’t run into campers all the time anymore. ”

    - Lucky you. They should at least do something to fix it. For instance, campers in Killzone 2…… you know why you don’t here about them? Cuz it doesn’t work that well…. because your character actually has quite a bit of heft to it (For everyones information….. when you are an actual fully equiped soldier, you DON’T move like a ballerina that weights ninety pounds), there are special powers that make camping almost suicidal, and the sniper rifle requires quite a bit of skill.

    But I guess there’s always got to be that one game that campers can jizz over for in excitement.

    That and the fact most players (I’ve met) on there like to hunt campers and molest their bodies – like me.

powered by SEO Super Comments

Rate This Post:

155 Comments
  • Belisaurius
    September 8, 2009
    #1

    I’d find a way into the Admech first chance I get.

    Sure, now im an unholy monstrosity of meat and metal, but I’ve got a good chance at long life, a steady job at something useful, and a decent chance at progressing up the ranks.

  • Kenny C.
    September 8, 2009
    #2

    @ Belisaurius

    For once, I agree with you.

  • L-W
    September 8, 2009
    #3

    The key here is standardization, how do you equip a trillion man army with the best weapons available when most platoons and regiments are hundreds of light years apart?

    The Lasgun is actually a pretty awesome weapon, with individual pulses being ten times more powerful than a hand grenade at even low powered shots and so cheap and easy to manufacture that even the most backwater of planets can mass produce them from very basic materials.

    Unfortunately, it just so happens that every other faction likes to standardize their troops with molecule thin shurikens, rocket propelled self-detonating .75 caliber bullets, plasma cannons, flesh eating maggots, holy napalm, daemon spirit spitting handguns, lava and even the tears of the God Emperor himself. In comparison, even an uber laser gun appears to be a futile gesture.

  • Diana
    September 8, 2009
    #4

    “The key here is standardization, how do you equip a trillion man army with the best weapons available when most platoons and regiments are hundreds of light years apart?”

    Light Speed travel and galactic spread of weapon manufacturing will do.

  • Kenny C.
    September 8, 2009
    #5

    Neither would do very well in the Imperium

    - Light Speed Travel – The Warp is Finicky

    - Weapons manufacturing – The Imperium’s mechanics haven’t changed anything for the part ten thousand years.

  • Diana
    September 8, 2009
    #6

    Warp travel is different from Light Speed Travel(That is to say from the perspective of W40K)

  • Kenny C.
    September 8, 2009
    #7

    See second dash for reason why Imperium has no light speed.

  • L-W
    September 8, 2009
    #8

    “Light Speed travel and galactic spread of weapon manufacturing will do.”

    Not when you have to keep the military standard equal in a ground army compromised of trillions of soldiers.

    Even the US military struggles to standardize her few hundred thousand troops currently in service, extrapolating this by several billion orders of magnitude is a logistical nightmare to even the number crunching machine that is the Imperium.

  • Diana
    September 8, 2009
    #9

    @L-W

    Lets just say that not every soldier is worth a thousand grand to be equip with standard issues. And not all of the money of taxpayers goes to the highest bidder(Military equipment manufacturers)

  • L-W
    September 8, 2009
    #10

    That’s what standardization means.

  • Jwlynas
    September 8, 2009
    #11

    “4) They have a good sniper rifle. And as every student of history knows, wars are won and lost on the basis of who has the better sniper rifle, not on the basis of something as inconsequential as overwhelming numerical, technological, and logistical superiority.”

    Except of course that good sniper fire is all it takes to turn the Tau from organised fire teams and expert manouvers to disorganised and fleeing. An Ethereals death is a HUGE morale blow to the Tau, and with flying snipers who can get into a good firing position whatever happens, and with the ethereals having robes, no head protection and no personalised shielding, all it will take is one good shot and the Tau, at least the Tau under that ethereals leadership, will scatter.

    Considering all Tau troops barring those under Commander Farsights command, are under the direct control of an Ethereal, that sort of advantage can’t be ignored.

    The Covenant may have the same issue with the Prophets, but they at least have shielding and the intelligence enough to stay off the front lines.

    As to the teleportation, Its not so much that as some sort of gravity well… but whatever it is that the covenant use to get ground troops from ships in space to the ground without breaking bones or having easily shot down troop carriers.

  • Matapiojo
    September 8, 2009
    #12

    “The Covenant may have the same issue with the Prophets, but they at least have shielding and the intelligence enough to stay off the front lines.”

    You know, there are such things as Shield Drones…

  • Diana
    September 8, 2009
    #13

    @L-W

    Yes! At last I got the point! Now I know that my mind is not dried up…

    “Never forget that your weapon was made by the lowest bidder” – CoD 4

  • L-W
    September 8, 2009
    #14

    1) Once again, you seem to have a misconceived notion that a sniper is so tactically relevant that they forever alter the tide of warfare in lieu of dozens of other far more important factors, which they do not. Whilst the assassination of political leaders is no doubt a bonus to the opposition, lone black ops missions are inconsequential in comparison overwhelming numerical, technological, and logistical superiority.

    Anyone with even a minor understanding of military history could tell you that.

    2) Ah, the classic “if I kill the Ethereal, I automatically win” tabletop gambit. Unfortunately the relevance of this game play mechanic to fluff is equal to that of the 20% Necron phase rule. A common misconception of the Tau army is that without the Ethereal that was in the space of that horrid mangled corpse five seconds ago, the tau will simply up and run. Not true at all.

    As Commander Shas’O Vior’la Shovah Kais Mont’yr demonstrated during the Damocles Crusade, in the absence of the Ethereal, nearby Tau will regain their independence and free will, but their force of discipline (the Fire Caste have trained from birth onwards) keeps them in place. Without the oppressive will of the Ethereals, Tau warriors will begin to behave independently and act on their best judgment and intuition. They do not (I repeat), they do not run around like headless Chickens, the Tau aren’t Grunts after all.

    Don’t panic, this is a perfectly healthy and often necessary response from a trained soldier, one that saves lives as a result.

    Ultimately though this all assumes that an Ethereal is going to stand right in the open at all times, rather than coordinating or observing Tau forces from the general safety of the rear lines, a bunker or a command vehicle.

    3) That’s the gravity lift you refer to, which to me seems like less of a logical choice. Whereas dropships can disperse and behave independently (guaranteeing that someone, somewhere gets through), a Covenant Cruiser dropping into low orbit is just too much of a tempting target for any Tau forces nearby.

    The moment one of these things parks too close to start disgorging troops, the Tau fighters and bombers such as the Tiger Shark or the AX-10 are going to start playing target practice with an bulbous oversized target. Never mind the fact that the sky will be swarming with Manta fighters armed with dedicated anti-Titan weapons reay to pick off capital ships at a moments notice.

  • Belisaurius
    September 8, 2009
    #15

    I wonder how broadsides would far against a phantom…

  • Jwlynas
    September 8, 2009
    #16

    “As Commander Shas’O Vior’la Shovah Kais Mont’yr demonstrated during the Damocles Crusade, in the absence of the Ethereal, nearby Tau will regain their independence and free will, but their force of discipline (the Fire Caste have trained from birth onwards) keeps them in place. Without the oppressive will of the Ethereals, Tau warriors will begin to behave independently and act on their best judgment and intuition. They do not (I repeat), they do not run around like headless Chickens, the Tau aren’t Grunts after all.”

    The exception does not prove the rule. That particular commander is a hasty, aggressive combatent, with a mysterious weapon of unknown origins (That looks incredibly egyptian and archaic, and frankly tzeentchian, but this is hardly the place to debate it) and a large preference close quarters combat. Were all Tau commanders like him, Ethereals would be obsolete, but then again, the Tau would be a hugely different army. As it is, they have a very high standing, and in some cases their defeat results in the routing of the whole tau war effort.

    “You know, there are such things as Shield Drones…”

    Sniper drones too, and its odd that no-one mentions them as a counter to the Covenant Jackals. However shield drones are linked to battlesuits and drone commanders. Ethereals, barring the lead Ethereal (name escapes me at the moment… he has a floating chair and is for all intents and purposes a Tau prophet of truth.) don’t use them, preferring instead to have their bodyguards be the shields.

    “3) That’s the gravity lift you refer to, which to me seems like less of a logical choice. ”

    Ah, my thanks, forgot the name. While its far from perfect, its still a fine way to deliver troops. Land it somewhere with cover, disgorge troops, let them do some footslogging and attack from a flank. its hardly a genius level tactic, so I’m sure the elites can manage to use it.

    Tau stealth suits are generally more scouting parties than offensive weapons. They are wholly capable at offense, but if it comes tot hat then somethings gone wrong.

  • L-W
    September 8, 2009
    #17

    1) “I wonder how broadsides would far against a phantom…”

    If a 90mm tank round can punch a hole through a Phantom, a single broadside is literally going to turn it inside out due to the sheer force of the propellant created by a slug moving at relativistic velocities through the hull of a vessel.

    Imagine if you will the contents of a box getting sucked through a small penny sized hole, and you gain a decent image of what would happen to a Phantom.

    2) Hardly an exception to the rule, because it demonstrates that even without the overt psychic presence of the Ethereal in question (as claimed by the Fire Warrior novel), Tau soldiers can still maintain discipline on a squad based level, without losing their morale all together. The loss of the Ethereal merely grants the Tau the initiative on an individual basis, it doesn’t rob them of their will to live.

    Although the sight of even the largest and most heavily armoured Covenant troops turning into a charred heap of briquettes as a result of a single burst from the standard issue Pulse rifle would be more of a morale booster than anything else.

    3) A 1.7km vessel generally doesn’t posses a low profile, or offer much in terms of subtlety, does it? Do you really think that a Covenant warship is going to slip past the general orbital superiority of the Tau navy without alerting it’s presence to potential swarms of atmospheric fighters capable of stellar interdiction speeds, or that any landing attempt won’t suffer heavy casualties as a result?

    As I said, the most logical solution would be to deploy and scatter Phantoms over a wide area, and enough of them to ensure that the Tau air force doesn’t turn entire legions into ionized scrap as a result. Whilst they transport fewer troops into a specific region, their low profile would make them harder targets; whereas dropping a Capital ship onto a planet (the UNSC lacked the firepower to repel this kind of incursion – the Tau don’t) is the equivalent of painting an Elephant luminous green and asking poachers to take pot shots at it.

    4) The stealth technology of either party is not fit for direct battlefield confrontations, in fact the entire idea is so absurd that it goes entirely against the purpose of the technology in the first place.

    As I said before, the Tau are the worst possible enemy for the Covenant to face: its strengths (superior firepower, disciplined troops, rugged and heavily armed warships, robust and mature technologies with the common implementation of AI, highly mobile ground forces capable of rapid deployment) play directly to the Covenant weaknesses (almost complete dependence upon orbital superiority, technologies with built-in weaknesses such as their inability to harness the true potential of their imitated firearms, poorly armoured and egg shell thin warships, reliance on cannon fodder, limited mobility, zero initiative or AI assistance). The key here is mobility, the Covenant work best against bogged down or entrenched positions where they can overwhelm them with sheer brute force alone, Tau doctrine is designed for mobility, thus making them a particularly tough army to face off against.

  • Jwlynas
    September 8, 2009
    #18

    Out of curiousity, what would then be the covenants strengths?

    Ah dear, another defeat for the underdogs I fear.

    One day they’ll come out on top. One day

  • megafire
    September 8, 2009
    #19

    Well, in their own universe, it would be brute force, superior technology and firepower, air superiority ant the likes.

    Against the Tau… I’d say brute force…

  • Sapper007
    September 8, 2009
    #20

    @ L-W agreed. But who is the agressor? that would weigh heavily on tactic’s and planning and defense…

    So the question to be asked is who’s fleet can logically get to the other planet faster?

  • Kenny C.
    September 8, 2009
    #21

    @ Megafire

    Brute force…ha.. ha ha … HA HAA HAHAAHHAAAAA… man that is good!

    See Greater Knarloc.

  • L-W
    September 8, 2009
    #22

    He’s right through, the one tactic the Covenant have always fallen back on was sheer brute force and brute force alone.

    During the war of the Sangheili and the San ‘Shyuum, the latter used their captured Dreadnought to smash through enemy lines, the Grunt rebellion was stymied with a violent oppression that was followed by years of experimental eugenics, the Hunters were tamed with the threat of orbital bombardment, the Brutes fell through several technological tiers as a result of a nuclear civil war and the war with humanity proved that in lieu of subtlety, the Covenant prefer to just smash through UNSC defences head on and overwhelm planetary forces before turning the crust into glass.

  • L-W
    September 8, 2009
    #23

    On the subject of Covenant firepower, I posted some calculations on a previous thread. Here they are if anyone is interested:

    During Halo: First Strike, an asteroid three kilometers in diameter is struck by a Covenant energy beam, which according to the text took several seconds to bore a hole through the main structure and shatter the remainder, leaving behind several hundred tonnes of visibly ejected globules (Presumably a combination of molten iron).

    The passage says the asteroid was shattered through “uneven internal heating”, ie thermal expansion. If the beam had just punched straight through it wouldn’t have fractured through “uneven internal heating”, it would have exploded due to shock. We don’t get a beam punching through, shocking the surrounding rock and causing it to fracture. We know the asteroid wasn’t shocked, so the beam can’t have cut through the rock faster than the speed of sound in iron. This puts a burn time of 0.6s as the absolute minimum. 0.6s of contact with a 500 gigaton beam should have delivered 250 gigatons into the rock. More than enough to completely vapourise it with a surplus of excess energy to spare.

    We get a beam striking the asteroid, its surface being “heated to orange, yellow, and then white,”, note that it takes a noticable amount of time to change through the colours, the asteroid spraying molten debris long enough for its rotation to change, the beam cutting through a “wide arc” of the asteroid, and then emerging from the other side. There are five visibly distinct phases there, orange, yellow, white, rotating, and finally exploded.

    Let’s do that in more detail. We know the asteroid was white hot in patches. This gives a temperature of 6500K. From this we can work out the average KE per mole, and by extension, the momentum of ejected gasses. In a best case scenario, this works out at 2500kgm/s per kilogram. The moment of inertia of the asteroid is 10^17kgm^2. The average moment generated by a kilogram of ejecta will be 1,875,000kgm^2/s (well, actually it’ll be less than that, because it’s not all concentrated into a tangential jet, but that’s just another thing that makes this calc rather conservative), meaning 5.3*10^10kg needs to be ejected in this fashion per radian/sec of momentum change. That’s half the total mass of the asteroid. Let’s assume a single degree per second of rotation due to the ejected mass. That’s visible, but practically crawling around, it being six times slower than the second hand on a watch. Still need to eject 10^9kg of material. Let’s assume a 5m wide area. Given that the beam is supposed to be “laser fine”, this again is very conservative. This would require vapourising down to a depth of 2 km. Problem: The average speed of the ejecta was only 3km/s. With an absolute lower limit of 0.4s to burn down to a depth of 2km, it would still have taken another 0.66s for the last of it to escape, meaning a contact time of 1.07s is a very conservative lower limit. Oh, look, you’ve just dumped over 500 gigatons into a rock that only takes 33 GT to shatter. The gunner was Cortana. An AI who was described as using plasma beams “like a scalpel”. “Like a scalpel” implies very fine control, ie that she turned off the beam the moment it penetrated with very little waste.

    The asteroid was the size of the firing ship, and had a much higher moment of inertia. If the plasma did have significant momentum, we’d see ships firing it be pushed around. Quite noticeably. The impulse required to duplicate the asteroid-spinning is enough to make a ship of that size recoil at 800m/s (assuming only 90% empty space, and a density of iron, which given how unfeasibly spacious Covenant ships are is something of an underestimate). We don’t see Covenant ships firing plasma beams being pushed around or put into spins by the recoil, even when they’re firing off axis, so they don’t have enough recoil to matter.

    Quite handily, this actually puts a 16.5GT/s upper limit on the firepower of that beam, with an excess of 27 megatons to shatter the asteroid itself.

    - – -

    Let’s not forget that this was a Cortana enhanced beam designed for optimum efficiency (according to her, the Covenant were neglecting the optimize the brute firepower of their plasma cannons to any degree), as earlier in the novel the Ascendant Justice is surrounded by four Covenant cruisers, two of which she detonates from a lancing strike from the laser like plasma weapons similar to the energy projector, which shares properties similar to the beam used to cut through the asteroid.

    Earlier it is demonstrated that the Ascendant Justice was resistant to several plasma torpedoes, and was reduced to only 67% of her shield capacity before Cortana took control and began to steer the ship towards Threshold, when another cluster of torpedoes fired from the pursuing covenant dropped the shields, gutting parts of the hull.

  • the_man_with The_Answers
    September 12, 2009
    #24

    Is there any ground battle where the covenant could win besides outnubering their enemy 4-1?

  • Kenny C.
    September 12, 2009
    #25

    @ the_man_with_the_Answers

    No…. just no.

  • Sean0931
    September 13, 2009
    #26

    “As I said before, the Tau are the worst possible enemy for the Covenant to face”

    Qualitatively, I agree with you, though quantitatively, there are far worse enemies for them to face. The Imperium, for example.

  • L-W
    September 14, 2009
    #27

    Heck, throw in the Culture, the Xelee, the Q, the Cosmocrats, Downstreamers and the Time Lords and you’ll have one hell of a shin dig, but that’s not the point of the statement.

    It’s to illustrate that from a tactical and strategic standpoint, Covenant strengths are nerfed by those of the Tau; why would I include other civilizations when the purpose of this thread is to discuss only the two presented?

  • Sean0931
    September 14, 2009
    #28

    Heck, throw in the Culture, the Xelee, the Q, the Cosmocrats, Downstreamers and the Time Lords and you’ll have one hell of a shin dig, but that’s not the point of the statement.”

    Neither was it the point of mine. I was stating that, while the Tau may have strengths against the Covenant, there are races in 40k which would be far more deadly. Hence the “qualitatively, not quantitatively”. I thought it should be reasonably easy to work out I was saying that other races in the 40k universe would be far more deadly. The Imperium, for example.

    “It’s to illustrate that from a tactical and strategic standpoint, Covenant strengths are nerfed by those of the Tau; why would I include other civilizations when the purpose of this thread is to discuss only the two presented?”

    Wait a minute, hold on. You said that “the Tau are the worst possible enemy for the Covenant to face”. What was that statement supposed to say then? That the Tau were the worst race the Covenant could face from a choice of… the Tau?

  • the_man_with The_Answers
    September 14, 2009
    #29

    I don’t think the Tau are the wost for the Covenant to face, though they are high up there. Wouldn’t the Imperium be much worse of an enemy to face?

  • L-W
    September 16, 2009
    #30

    “Wait a minute, hold on. You said that “the Tau are the worst possible enemy for the Covenant to face”. What was that statement supposed to say then? That the Tau were the worst race the Covenant could face from a choice of… the Tau?”

    Out of the races the Covenant HAVE canonically faced in the past and will face in this battle (I though this point was easy to understand by the fact that I surmised previous Covenant battle tactics with other races), whether they were the UNSC, the Hunters or each other, the Tau are the worst opponent that they can face off against on that list for precisely the reasons that I stated.

    Sure you can discuss the Imperium, but who is talking about the Imperium here? In fact I made this point quite clear in posts #122 and #117, for every advantage that the Covenant possessed within their respective universe, they will lose to the Tau. It’s a simple concept really.

    - – -

    I could also go on to say that the Kryptonians defeat the Covenant, or the Tyranids, the Night Sisters, the Empire, the Burning Legion, Photino Birds, Andalites, the Vogons, DOOP, the Replicators, the Vong, the Eternals, the Golden Tribe, the Executioners, the Kiint, the Morveks, the Noocytes, the Vorlons, the Jurai, the Ori etc. etc. blah. blah.

    It just gets to a point where banality becomes less and less of a virtue in debates.

  • Black Hand
    September 16, 2009
    #31

    The covenant will embrace space communism and their numbers mysteriously decreasing within the next 50 years the tau will outnumber other covenant species with the possible exception of the grunts and hunters.

    We could pit the covenant against stargate earth at the start of the series for them to finally be on the advantage?

  • i dunno
    September 19, 2009
    #32

    the covenant have the advantedge of melee
    both the brutes and elites have some serious melee handiwork going forward
    of course, the kroot arent too shabby as far as melee goes.

    range: the covies have the fast firing but sh*t plasma weapons, after halo one the plasma pistol just sucks. the only advantedge the covenant have at range are

    vehicles: the tau have hover tanks, as do the covies. the tau have f*cking railguns mounted on their tanks, the covenant have plasma mortars, which are ok

    air support: the tau have the fast, heavily armed, and large barracuda. the covenant have the small, lightly armed , fun to drive banshee.

    the ONLY way the covenant can win would be to drop thousands of elites from orbit right on top of the tau. and that brings me to space, the tau are terrible at naval combat, it took them in excess of 1000 years to build up a fleet, the imperium destroyed a lot of it in months. the covenant have respectable fleet that smashed UNSC resistance at almost every battle.

    tau: land victory
    covenant: space victory

  • Kenny C.
    September 19, 2009
    #33

    @ i dunno

    ” the ONLY way the covenant can win would be to drop thousands of elites from orbit right on top of the tau ” – Which might be difficult considering the Covenant’s current political landscape.

    ” vehicles: the tau have hover tanks, as do the covies. the tau have f*cking railguns mounted on their tanks, the covenant have plasma mortars, which are ok ” – You forgot the kick ass battle suits… and the Greater Knarloc.

    ” the tau are terrible at naval combat, ” – Terrible? They were outnumbered for Christ sakes and the fact that they could even stand against an Imperial Fleet makes them vastly superior to the Covenant’s fleets.

    ” of course, the kroot arent too shabby as far as melee goes. ” – Believe me, they would beat the shit of the Covenant if it went Hand to hand. The Kroot have been able to go toe to toe with the Orks, which is quite a feat considering the capablity of the average ork to smash heads around.

  • Sean0931
    September 20, 2009
    #34

    “Out of the races the Covenant HAVE canonically faced in the past and will face in this battle (I though this point was easy to understand by the fact that I surmised previous Covenant battle tactics with other races), whether they were the UNSC, the Hunters or each other, the Tau are the worst opponent that they can face off against on that list for precisely the reasons that I stated.”

    So a choice from; the Tau, the UNSC and the Flood? A rather pathetic list, wouldn’t you say?

    I’d say that the flood were a far greater threat, anyway. If it weren’t for the Deus Ex Mechanica of the Halos and many other plot devices, the Covenant would have been utterly destroyed by the flood in short notice.
    “Sure you can discuss the Imperium, but who is talking about the Imperium here?

    Me.

    “In fact I made this point quite clear in posts #122 and #117, for every advantage that the Covenant possessed within their respective universe, they will lose to the Tau. It’s a simple concept really.”

    That’s nice, and I agree with you, but what has this got to do with my post?

    “I could also go on to say that the Kryptonians defeat the Covenant, or the Tyranids, the Night Sisters, the Empire, the Burning Legion, Photino Birds, Andalites, the Vogons, DOOP, the Replicators, the Vong, the Eternals, the Golden Tribe, the Executioners, the Kiint, the Morveks, the Noocytes, the Vorlons, the Jurai, the Ori etc. etc. blah. blah.

    It just gets to a point where banality becomes less and less of a virtue in debates.”

    Again, what’s the point? I was saying that, while qualitatively (as in their inherent qualities, not in their pound-for-pound power) the Tau are indeed suited for combat with the Covenant, in actuality there are far more deadly enemies in 40k. And your problem with this is?

  • i dunno
    September 20, 2009
    #35

    i always think of the covies in a pre schism context, when the elites were evil and the brutes were unheard of, i mean the halo 1 covenant. damn, those were the days…

    even if the tau were outnumbered by the IOM navy, they were still developing naval warfare.

    and since when was the greater knarlock a vehicle?! and the battlesuits sort of bridge the cap between infantry and vehicle.
    kroot = instant win

    about half the enemies the tau face would be capable of beating the living crap out of the entire covenant army in about a day, so i think we can say that the tau win this one.

  • Kenny C.
    September 20, 2009
    #36

    @ i dunno

    ” since when was the greater knarlock a vehicle? ” -Since Dawn of War Dark Crusade, bitch.

  • Sean0931
    September 21, 2009
    #37

    “@ i dunno

    ” since when was the greater knarlock a vehicle? ” -Since Dawn of War Dark Crusade, bitch.”

    Because Daemon armour was completely fucking overpowered. Damn DW1 Squiggoths.

  • Tom
    October 2, 2009
    #38

    Just a note here – in the games the effectiveness of covenant plasma weaponry is very downplayed. A shade turret will tear a human apart (as in 2 parts, from 1 shot)

    Also a Human SMAC is 51 Gigaton and it can shoot straight through a covenant capital ship.

  • Inarto
    October 2, 2009
    #39

    @Tom
    So then the Shade turret is a bit stronger than the standard issue pulse rifle for the Tau. If we were to compare the shade turret to similar Tau weapons you would see just how much of an advantage the Tau have in firepower. For example their railgun is capable in taking out a Leman russ or land raider in one shot, whose hulls are made of plasteel and admantium which are much more durable then the materials used by the Covenant

  • Tom
    October 2, 2009
    #40

    Im not sure about the 40k world, just stating what I know from the Halo world.

    Also the covenant have antimatter technology. (again just putting this out there not debating as I don’t know 40k so can’t really state anything)

  • Kenny C.
    October 2, 2009
    #41

    @ Tom

    All of this has been considered and the outcome is the same… Tau win.

  • Tom
    October 3, 2009
    #42

    I only brought up antimatter because if you run a text search on the page, only 1 other antimatter entry is brought up and it relates to engines so didn’t seem at all like this had been considered, at least in this discussion anyway.

    Really it would be better if they pitted more well suited enemies against each other. At the moment we have a group from 2500 and one from 40000.

    Forerunner would be interesting, I mean they can traverse from one galaxy to another in an instant, can slipspace your ship to the middle of a star, can create, modify or at least move stars and can create a ring thats 10 000km in diameter in less than a year. Not to mention they can slipspace that ring to another galaxy and activate it remotely and said ring will wipe out sentient life 25000 light years around it.

    At the moment though it is hugely unfair – its obvious the Tau would win because they are so much more advanced from being in the future and having ships and infantry that can take huge amounts of damage.

  • Kenny C.
    October 3, 2009
    #43

    @ Tom

    Well… that’s FactPile and thats Warhammer 40,000 – The most brutal and violent fictional universes ever conceived.

  • the_man_with The_Answers
    October 31, 2009
    #44

    I want the Forunner Trilogy to come out. There is alot unkown about them and from what everyone’s seen, the forunners look pretty damned impressive. Especially the whole building/transporting planet sized weapons in less than a year that can kill everything within 2500 light years.

  • Forward Unto Dawn
    December 11, 2009
    #45

    The Tau would get screwed if the Elites were flying the BCs. remember- one Elite fleet has the battle prowess of 3 brute fleets.
    But we would also need to know if Tau fleets are susceptible to slipspace rupture slaughter. If so, all the covvies need to do would be to jump into the Tau fleet and then open uninterrupted slipspace ruptures. From there on, it’d be a downhill wormhole ride for the Tau.

  • Inarto
    December 12, 2009
    #46

    @Forward Unto Dawn
    When have the covenant shown this ability to open controlled slipspace rifts? In all the halo media I played/read I dont think the covenant once used this as a tactic. I was unable to find any mention of this on halopedia either. However I havent played the most recent games or read all the books, so if they can do this then I apologise.
    Onto your next point, prowess is good and all but it doesnt really matter if your completly outgunned by a competent enemy.

  • shaun182
    December 12, 2009
    #47

    “I want the Forunner Trilogy to come out. There is alot unkown about them and from what everyone’s seen, the forunners look pretty damned impressive. Especially the whole building/transporting planet sized weapons in less than a year that can kill everything within 2500 light years.”

    i suggest you go read L-W post about forerunners on page 6, i believe, on the flood vs chimera thread, its both funny and true.

  • Forward Unto Dawn
    December 14, 2009
    #48

    The Covenant have been known to screw Earth with something called an Uncontrolled Slipspace Rupture where a spaceship with slipspace capability can hitch a ride with them while anything else gets hit by something with the calibre of a Death Star beam… They screwed New Mombasa after all.

  • Forward Unto Dawn
    December 14, 2009
    #49

    The only disadvantage being that it requires a ship with a slipspace engine to use it and has a “ground zero” firing range of zero.

  • shaun182
    December 14, 2009
    #50

    doesnt that require i ship, getting into a tau worlds atmosphere, which is not going to be easy, with the tau shooting any ship that comes now.

  • Goldman
    December 22, 2009
    #51

    Can we wrap this up? We’ve proven beyond a doubt that the Tau are more mobile and tactical with better technology.

    And they dont charge Spartans with spears.

    Nominate the Tau for the Fact Pile award.

  • L-W
    March 3, 2010
    #52

    1) “So a choice from; the Tau, the UNSC and the Flood? A rather pathetic list, wouldn’t you say?”

    No one said the list had to be composed of brilliant contenders, merely contenders. If you understood this rather simple concept we would not be having this conversation as of now.

    2) “Me.”

    Then you are the only one bringing up an irrelevant point of conjecture.

    3) “That’s nice, and I agree with you, but what has this got to do with my post?”

    Try and maintain the route of discourse Shaun, otherwise no one else will. Now try and keep it relevant to what we’re discussing as to avoid further derailing us.

    4) “Again, what’s the point? I was saying that, while qualitatively (as in their inherent qualities, not in their pound-for-pound power) the Tau are indeed suited for combat with the Covenant, in actuality there are far more deadly enemies in 40k. And your problem with this is?”

    My problem is that you would derail the topic of the conversation with a rather anal demonstration of listed science fiction Empires (something that’s not new to you) and accuse me of sophistry in the process, a matter that I will not take lightly.

    Now keep any of your comments relevant to the thread, or don’t bother.

  • shaun182
    March 3, 2010
    #53

    you had me confused for i minute, you meant sean0931 but used my way of spelling the name.

  • L-W
    March 3, 2010
    #54

    My apologies, I’ll make sure it doesn’t happen again.

  • shaun182
    March 3, 2010
    #55

    its no problem, and your not the first and most probably wont be the last.

    you just used my spelling instead of his, its worse when people think its me thats the one that has posted, and i get blamed for his rubbish, hell i can create enough rubbish of my own, before taking someone elses.

  |  
Categories
Heads Up Recent Posts Latest Comments Most Popular Topics Polls

Are you going to see Machete?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...