@Forward Unto Dawn- Your entire post is made up of bullshit and lies. First MC’s assault rifle use bullets no different from modern day rifles the ammo being 7.62 meaning completely ineffective against his armour. Second nothing in MC’s armour can even scratch the paint on Iron Mans suit. Third Iron Man would not waste his time trying to pull of his helmet when he can destroy MC with anyone of his numerous weapons. And Last Iron Man doesn’t need to board the craft since he can rip it apart with his bear hands. So unless you can provide proof for your statements get the fuck out of here you lying troll fanboy.

mc will win handsdown cuz iron man doznt have super human strenth he just haz a suit master chief duz however and cortana iz smarter than jarviz or whatever hiz name iz not to mention bubble shield or and other of the equipment mc could kill anyone really

okay this match would be funny to watch because ironman would be thrown around like a ragdoll and the master chief will just laugh and keep throwing iron man around all over the place……then cortana goes and shuts down tony’s iron man suit and then the mc holds up iron man takes two plasma grenades and sticks them to starks helmet then throws him through the air and iron man goes boom

Ok, first off you have to go by the Halo books not the game. In the books MC is larger and stronger than iron man. Secondly once the Spartans recieve full upgrades to thier armor they also virtually indestructable. Furthermore unlike the game the Spartans can run roughly 80 mph and have reaction times at roughly 10 milliseconds. (Basically able to dodge bullets) Most importantly as someone already stated MC has Cortana, a futuristic AI super computer that could Easily hack into Tony’s armor and shut it down, probably even make it do whatever she wanted it to. Without Cortana though it would be a pretty fair fight.

IM is far stronger then Master Chief. I’m qute confident that he could beat MC senseless without firing a single blast. 100 ton strength level.

Ironman is a pretty cool guy.
eh gets beaten into a coma and gets shot down by afghani militants and doesn’t afraid of anything.

Ok see,as a marvel fan let me correct everyone.

Does anyone keep up with Ironman?Cause last i checked,he was deleting his mind,infact his mind is so far gone he can’t properly pilot most of his suits.
his last good suit was shot down by a militant group,where he had to then dawn his mark zero armor(the big bulky one,aka the very first ironman suit.)

Anyways,He isn’t winning this with a punch nor is he going to pull MC inside out his ass.

Anyone who is interested as to his current affairs,he was beaten down by osborn,and now they are working on rebooting his mind.

Well if he’s a vegetable then he looses but MC’s fate is technically debated and its still unknown if the legendary is a easter egg or not so until its proven its a vegetable vs a dead man. Yippy Ki Yay!

Whats the point?
It would be a tie since both characters are incapacitated.

Though i have given thought to this rule,though i don’t think if someone was last seen knocked out,that version should be used.

“Though i have given thought to this rule,though i don’t think if someone was last seen knocked out,that version should be used.”

I think this basically what we’ve always done, despite the rule. If a character has already died, for example, it’s obvious we’d use the version where they were last in full health.

“In any case a better match up I think would be MC versus Captain America. Both are genetically enhanced supersoldiers.”

http://www.factpile.com/master-chief-vs-captain-america.htm#comments

I’m with EnigmaJ on this. Being a vegetable is equatable to being dead in a match up since you can’t fight back and with MC in stasis or dead we use them both when they are in their prime so it was actually kind of pointless for you to even bring that up.

I think he meant the last time they WEREN’T incapcitated,not thier prime.
MC last time had perfectly working armor(as far as i remember,haven’t played the campaign in over a year) and ironman pre-coma had Mark zero.
So that would be the fighters.

+1 nomination here

“Marche was just trying to sneak a win for MC…”

Firstly,why would i care if MC had one less/more FP award?i don’t come on the mainsite all that much as it is,and a fictional character winning a battle wouldn’t have any effect on me in anyway.

Seconly, Anyone who knows me best would know i am a bigger Marvel fan than anything,so i wouldn’t want one against a marvel character.Alas rules is rules.

1. No its not,all he can do is jump really high via air pressure.

2.Miniature hacksaws? ok thats nice.Monobeam?has crappy range. the only thing he has that can help is the magnetic turbo insulators.

3.A true point,one that MC may not be able to do anything about.

This is neglecting Ironmans mental state,and if he will be able to fight competently(admitly i haven’t seen him fight anybody with Mark zero recently.)

1. Which equates to greater mobilty still

2. Don’t care if it equates to at least 7.62 round then its good enough since MC’s newest suit can take to many of those due to reduction in armour for increased speed.

However in the movie his suits power doesn’t last to long. How does it last in the comic books since I haven’t read those cause that can be a deciding factor.

I wanted to have the match to end with MC as a pile of ashes.
Sounds like this will end up MC running out of ammo and a fist fight starting so…
What is the mark 0′s strength instead of the good old 100 tons?

his strength increases ten-fold with the armor on.

Not that i recall,i have heard it mentioned by other than that is pretty primitive.
Everything is controlled manually.

If that is the case MC wins…damn!
Stark will go insane before the fight becomes a draw.
MC can go a long time without food, Stark cannot. Not to mention the power would run out before he has a chance to kill him.
Damn comic book writers…hmmm.
Can we use a current Incarnation from a alt time line?If we can Iron Man will win.

“Can we use a current Incarnation from a alt time line?If we can Iron Man will win.”

And this is exactly the reason we have the current incarnations rule in the first place.

meh a zombie in a Iron suit vs MC…
:/ so MC for Factpile award?

So give this to MC and have a rematch later when he is not a vegetable?
MC will be to resourceful in this fight to lose.
Brute force only wins when used properly.

So they are killing Iron Man off and restarting?
Unless someone like Mr.Fantastic saves him…

Well, actually IM will be back to normal soon it seems. What with Siege and all.

It depends on how read you are in the stories.

If you count in Cortana hacking IM’s suit, yeah its no contest. And I would, as half of the time she is in MC’s armor with him.

But if you call her as outside help, it comes down to weapons. Reading the books, MC seems to prefer his MA5B, firing 14.5mm rounds along w/ a rocket launcher when he gets close to armored targets (hunters, Shades, wraiths). When encountering lightly armored, he replaces the launcher with a shotgun. So if he knows he’s encountering an armored opponent, he’ll go with the launcher. Not to mention a few grenades, etc. Going with that…

His reaction time is far faster than IM, nearly 10milliseconds. And IM’s Mach 1+ speed only comes when he’s flying, other than that he’s just extraordinarily fast. But not at the level of MC. His armor is harder, but has no shields. On the topic of weapons, IM’s main is his palm-energy blasts. However, its been shown that MJOLNIR armor can take several plasma shots straight to the chest before even allowing a Spartan to be injured at all. Couple the fact that his armor can take around 5 plasma hits, not counting shields, and that he is almost fast enough to dodge bullets, it all comes down to whether or not MC can penetrate IM’s armor. I’d say no, unless he happened to have some covenant weapons or plasma grenades. So it is so even, no one can guess who’d win. Just depends if MC happened to have more high-powered weapons on hand. With just his normal weapons, he can’t kill IM, but IM still can’t kill him…

Too Even.

and mc has the better armor but it does not have guns like iron man does but mc armor is still stronger and better

Iron man definatley has Master Chief outgunned. He wouldn’t have to get close to Master Chief at all to engage. If he did though, Master Chief could rip him apart. being that he is a superhuman with that has been trained for war since he was 6 years old. Range trumps strength any day though.

“mc had army traing since he was 6. and went to war when he was 12 and later on at the same age the army maid him take a drug whitch maid him faster/stronger/smater. at the age of 14 he got given the armor whitch maid him a little more stronger and faster. so he can take iron man out because iron man did not even have army traing. and mc armor is more advanced as well because it is set 500 years in the futer. if mc did not have the armor it would be a fair fight for iron man”

what are to talking about? Iron mans armor is superior in every way. manueverability, portability, weapons, loadout, armor, shielding

MC doesn’t carry over shields around. And while IM only has the Repulsors and the Uni-Beam (And a 100 ton strength level) they still output way more damage and range then any Halo weapon.

“No one though cortana can hack through ironman’s shield :/? Cortana is from 2552, iron man is from 2010?”

She is known as outside help therefore she is not in this match

“No one though cortana can hack through ironman’s shield :/? Cortana is from 2552, iron man is from 2010?”

And since when could Cortana hack from a distance, every time it’s been done with physical contact.

“Wow it’s amazing how Halo fans like to spout (very crude) information about Halo without any actual knowledge into it. It really makes me sick.”

Tell me about it, I once had guy claim that the bubble shield could stand up to the Death Star’s Superlaser…

I am no longer surprised by some of the stupidity Halotics tend let dribble out of their mouths. “The bubble shield can stop any weaponry in Halo, so obviously it could stop a planet destroyer.” Infallible logic.

my router was broken so i had to replace it so i couldn’t post for 2 weeks anyway hmmmmmm……. I saw a similar battle wait never mind that was captain America.I like halo but I’m not one to make up crap to justify MC like a fanboy.

“No one though cortana can hack through ironman’s shield :/? Cortana is from 2552, iron man is from 2010?”Who will win the Zombie from 2552 or the guy with a shotgun in the year 2010?
The future can be much weaker than the past, so by saying
“its from the future it’s better” you are being an ignorant d*ck.

“Tell me about it, I once had guy claim that the bubble shield could stand up to the Death Star’s Superlaser…”

no way, you are kidding right?

… why does Cortana hacking Iron man’s shield matter? he’ll be dead… and why would iron man even need his shield?

“I am dead serious, a guy said that the bubble shield could stand up to the Superlaser with a completely straight face. Same guy also said that MC could defeat the entire US Military by himself.”

oh, so he was mentally challenged, I get it now… my bad, I thought for a second, someone with a rational mind thought a hand held temporary shield could stand up to a superlaser that can destroy entire planets

Iron Man is currently back in his Mk.2 armour. I don’t think any more debating is needed.

master chief would win with the arbiter

ok with iron man in his normal suit this isn’t even fair >.>
the guy one shots tanks that look like scorpions.

Interesting. I happen to be a fan of both Iron Man and Master Chief. Who wins the fight really, would be very situational, at least given the insane qualities attributed to Iron Man’s suit. Because i’m familiar with it, I will be referring to the version of Iron Man presented in the recent movies. Honestly, Tony Stark survives assaults that should turn him into butter given the description of his armour. I don’t care if his armour is two inches thick of titanium alloy; 30mm cannons from a jet fighter flying towards him, meaning hypersonic 30mm rounds, hitting his armour, should punch holes right through him. The shear force of an impact with the aircraft’s wings at such velocities, even assuming the suit is of a composition stronger than the wing, should instantly kill, or at the least grievously wound the user of the suit. I also like how no one ever thinks of firing straight into his repulsors, or even at his arc reactor. or maybe at those vulnerable looking joint areas with thinner plating. What may be perceived as john’s seemingly lacking performance, is merely a more realistic approach to the depiction of the integrity of the armour he wears. He is a supersoldier, but a man nonetheless. There is no incentive to depict him as an infallible and invulnerable superhero. For shear ability, John has a distinctive upper hand in combat. Perhaps he would not fare so well in a lab tasked to design new weapons and create new technologies, but he is a master of combat tactics, and experienced. His intelligence in strategy on the battlefield, rivals the intelligence of tony stark in engineering. He possesses what any ordinary man, such as tony stark, would observe to be instantaneous reflexes, clocking reaction times of 10 milliseconds. His armour provides him with advanced shielding, targeting, weapon status tracking, and situation awareness, and houses a shipboard AI – Cortana. Before you go off about cortana being an unfair advantage, note that Stark has JARVIS, who manages many of the grueling tasks of managing the complex systems of tony’s armour, including but not limited to the calculation and stabilization of flight path and flight, respectively. Removing JARVIS from the equation, would severely cripple Stark’s ablities, whereas John could easily manage without Cortana and maintain a large degree of his previous combat effectiveness. Even with my limited intelligence and knowledge of battlefield tactics, it is only logical that upon observing stark’s abilities, john would avoid open areas vulnerable to air attack at all costs. Changing vectors rapidly mid-flight while travelling at near sonic or supersonic speeds is not an easy task, especially given areas with ample cover, obstacles, or other such hindrances. The assumption must also be made that John would be able to use his available weapons to maxiumum effect, targeting vulnerable areas, and timing throws of plasma grenades, which would presumably cause severe damage, if not instantaneous death. I trust that firearms have a greater effective range than stark’s repulsors, so making an argument from that point is ridiculous. How about close combat? Stark’s external armour layer doesn’t necessarily need to be destroyed in order for his limbs to sustain damage due to excessive torque. John has been extensively trained in hand to hand combat, and has reaction times of an average 10 milliseconds. For reference, taking into account the time it may take for him to move his body, he would be able to dodge bullets travelling at the speed of sound from a distance of roughly 10-15 metres, fired individually, assuming he is stationary. Stark would not be able to touch him. His claimed superior strength would be effectively nullified. There are three factors of utmost importance in combat between individuals: speed, reaction time, and superior tactics. As long as there is not a truly monumental disparity between the parties’ strength and technology, the side with superior training and response speed is almost definitely favoured. It could be close, but in my opinion, the Chief is slightly favoured, even if only because he doesn’t blindly run into open fire. Over-reliance on the armour is an automatic negative point for Stark.

How about Master Chief VS Archer?

MC has excellent military training an energy shielded suit of armor, is a master tactician, but Archer has UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS!!!

Before:”Mastercheif wins game over”
After:”Now let’s have a look at Iron Man’s armor, his armor comes from the mind of a1960’s comic book writer who knew next to nothing about physics[and so on and so forth] ”

FactPile has come a long way.

MC would win easily, it would not be a close fight
remember MC is 500 years more advanced than iron man- he can survive several plasma bolts(plasma is so hot that if your anywhere near it you would be dead)

A plasma rifle is many times more advanced and damaging than anything iron man has and the assault rifle would have bullets that can penetrate right through iron man’s armor.

MC’s armor would be better than iron mans armor and have a shield.

MC is just as strong as iron man(he can flip a tank and kill an elite with one hit to the back) an elite could throw a person and MC kills them

Mc can jump 7ft and his armor+himself weigh over 1000 pounds

MC was already the strongest, and best at fighting of all people then they augmented him, trained him and put him in the armor, Iron man without armor would not be good at fighting

the only advantage for iron man is flight but MC could snipe him down

well guys this is like superman you need certain wepons to kill him these are wepons that can kill him
spartanlaser.
gravhammer.
with spartan laser he can quickly doge the repulsrs and then crash his system then a nother blow will kill him same with grav hammer and he can throw a EMP(electcal magnitcal pulse) at him and his out