FactPile

Dark Light
Durza Vs Nazgul
Durza Vs Nazgul

Very cool match here. With both of these combatants able to inflict major blows, which one do you think would come away with the victory?

Rate This Post:

91 Comments
  • AHEM
    November 23, 2009
    #1

    Excellent! The Inheritance Cycle’s presence here seems to be growing. Good, very good.

    If this is the Witch King himself, then I think Durza probably won’t be walking away from this fight. If it is a standard Nazgul, however, just one of the nine, then the Shade won’t have much of a problem destroying their physical forms. Unless they can figure out Durza’s one weakness, he will probably destroy the Nazgul with powerful magic before this fight goes on for very long.

  • Syncourt
    November 24, 2009
    #2

    Woahh, yes! A comment! That means the weird error that stopped me from posting should be gone now!

    Alright, having read the Eragon series and part of the LOTR trilogy, it seems that these two contestants utilizes numerous similar abilities and skills.

    Both uses fear as their main weapon.
    They can both wield black/dark magic effectively.
    Both are skilled in weapons.

    However, if someone with more in-depth knowledge could post strengths/feats, it would help alot!

    Personally, I think Durza might lose this as he constantly underestimates his opponents. Also, he really likes to toy with his enemy until he ‘goes in for the kill’.

  • Matapiojo
    November 24, 2009
    #3

    This battle was continued on Factpiletopia.com while the site was experiencing posting issues yesterday. Here is the thread as it developped (now locked):
    http://www.factpiletopia.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=495

    Here are the discussions as they developped.

    ——————————————————————————————–
    by Sapper007 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:12 pm

    0 Comments

    Nazgul will absolutely ROFLstomp the shade Durza… Freaking OMG STFU ROFLstizzzomp Durza…

    100 battles
    101 wins for the nazgul

    ——————————————————————————————–
    by Matapiojo » Mon Nov 23, 2009 4:33 pm

    I don’t know.

    Opinion would have me beleive the fight won’t be as one-sided as you make it out to be, but I don’t really know enough about the Shade to make a real debate stand. I will leave it alone for now.

    Hopefully someone that has read the saga can prove that the Nazgul won’t win 101 at least. Maybe 80, but certainly not 101…

    ——————————————————————————————–
    by Sapper007 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:35 pm

    Nazgul are invisible to all but the bearer of the one ring Tolkien lore says the they wear armour only to do the dark lords bidding also the only nazgul to ever be killed in combat was their leader, the witch king. Even that took a being outside the race of humans wielding an ancient dagger from a burial mound that by sheer happenstnace, was designed to hurt nazgul. Nothing. Nothing the shade brings to the battle can Hurt a nazgul 101 wins for sure

    ——————————————————————————————–
    by Matapiojo » Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:49 pm

    Solid points, and most are quite valid, but you are once more breaking the no-limit fallacy rule. I’m not saying the shade has one, but we have to accept that equivalent weapons/items to that special dagger can be found across universes or these matches hold no value.

    Just saying.

    ——————————————————————————————–
    by Sapper007 » Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:06 pm

    2000 plus years of experience coupled with invisiblity and the fact the can only be damaged by Matas no limit breaking point weapon that can slay ghosts, wraiths etc I doubt that dirza can conjure magic capable of hurting a nazgul. Gandalf himself was only able to drive off the mount of the witch king. And then deny him acess to minis turith so assuming that one of the most powerful maiar on middle earth was only able to slow him what does the shade have. This is all assuming that he is going up against one Of the three warrior wraiths and not a king or sorcerer

    ——————————————————————————————–
    by Matapiojo » Mon Nov 23, 2009 10:42 pm

    I’m not arguing any of those points. What’s more, I am leaning to agree with them. I am just making an observation that you lean to no-limit fallacy arguments (such as the dagger in this example) with relative frequency.

  • chewie6000
    November 24, 2009
    #4

    I think your underestimating the shade sapper,
    while I’m undecided about the victor Durza can use a form of teleportation when he should die, eg when he was shot in the head by an arrow he disappeared in smoke then came back a few minutes later, I’m pretty sure it was of his own will too.

    also he’s not technically a man so he can kill them right?
    as I said I’m undecided.
    oh and my posts didn’t show up yesterday but I take it that it is fixed now?

  • Matapiojo
    November 24, 2009
    #5

    “oh and my posts didn’t show up yesterday but I take it that it is fixed now?”

    Yes, no one was able to post yesterday.

  • chewie6000
    November 24, 2009
    #6

    oh ok thanks,

    blah blah blah. Is this comment long enough yet?

  • ss
    November 24, 2009
    #7

    pretty enen match here i think

  • Sapper007
    November 24, 2009
    #8

    What?? No…
    The shade needs to wield a weapon designed to hurt wraiths…
    Narsil, the sword Aragorn wields in Return of the King can harm ghosts but not the wraith…

    The barrow blade the Merry wields was designed in the late 2nd Age too harm wraiths. thats why he and Eowyn were able to kill the Witch King. And the whole “no man can kill me” was a prophecy from an elf in the 1st age 2000-3000 years before. A prophecy… not a fact. So in reality anybody could kill the wraiths so long as they wielded the right weapon.

    They have also be shown to be nigh immune to magic. twice actually. When Glorfindel called upon Elrod and Gandalfs magic to flood the river, (From the books) the ring wraiths mounts were crushed under the magic of the river. but the nazgul were unharmed… they were given Felbeasts to ride because they were the only other creature that could tolerate the fear aura of the Nazgul. And gandalf was able to drive off the Felbeast at the battle of Minas Tirith. and stop it from entering the white city…

    Also, despite the movies, flames have little to no effect on them. The torch to face scenario effectively blinded the Nazgul but they where uninjured when they chased Glorfindel and Frodo.

    so, if we go by what is standard equipment… and by this i mean what they wore for milennia before the war of the ring…

    Nazgul-
    -no armor. thus completely invisible
    -intense fear aura, causing men to wet them selves and stand stricken dropping weapons and shields.
    -invisible blades that will kill you and turn you into a wraith.
    -three of the 9 are powerful sorcerers
    -invincible to all but weapons designed to kill wraiths

  • chewie6000
    November 24, 2009
    #9

    I think we should make it so Durza can harm the Nazgul or else this just becomes another pointless fight due to “he cant be harmed by anything but a specific weapon.”
    oh and sapper can you give me a link or a book title of where you got the information from because I am interested to find out more about middle earth etc.

  • ss
    November 24, 2009
    #10

    i think durza can as he is not a man, but a shade

  • Matapiojo
    November 24, 2009
    #11

    “i think durza can as he is not a man, but a shade”

    That is hardly a valid reason.

    I am not well versed in the Inheritance saga, so I cannot provide examples. In order for us to consider the Shade as capable of harming such a high tier undead creature as a Nazgul, you would have to provide examples of similar feats made by Durza.

    As far as my brief reshearch reveals, the Shade is essentially a human vessel to an otherwordly spirit, turning both into a third type of being. I am unsure whether or not this means Shades are unliving. Hopefully someone like AHEM or Jwlynas could be able to shed some light on these details.

  • AHEM
    November 24, 2009
    #12

    “while I’m undecided about the victor Durza can use a form of teleportation when he should die, eg when he was shot in the head by an arrow he disappeared in smoke then came back a few minutes later, I’m pretty sure it was of his own will too.”

    Durza can teleport at will, walk through shadows(E.g. he can step into a shadow and come out through a different shadow some distance away), and fly by propelling himself with magic. The “disappearing and coming back a few minutes later” was the result of his physical body being irrepairably damaged, resulting in him being momentarily stunned as his spiritual form built a new one.

    If anyone is interested in more information about Durza and Shades in general:

    http://inheritance.wikia.com/wiki/Shade

    “also he’s not technically a man so he can kill them right?”

    The prophecy that “not by the hand of man shall he fall” only applied to the Witch King. The other eight Nazgul wouldn’t have the benefit of this prophecy. Durza is male, but he is not technically a human being anymore; he is a physical shell that houses several powerful spirits and black magic.

    “What?? No…
    The shade needs to wield a weapon designed to hurt wraiths…”

    According to the author, the blade Durza carries has been magically strengthened by the mysterical power of the spirits that drive Durza, making it sharper, stronger, and more durable than a normal blade. In addition, Durza is a very powerful sorcerer, and his magic has been proven to affect ghosts and spiritual beings. The way he became a Shade in the first place was by overpowering a group of spirits and forcing them to fuse with his body and soul, creating a much more powerful being capable of killing the people who murdered his mentor.

    Furthermore, while the Nazgul’s mostly incorporeal form would escape most attacks, they still maintain a delicate link to the Seen and could be defeated if their physical form was destroyed.

    “The Nazgûl existed mostly in the wraith world (the Unseen), making them extremely difficult to harm. Ordinary weapons would not hurt them, and even weapons of Númenórean manufacture would be destroyed if they passed through the wraith forms of the Nazgûl. They could not, however, interact normally with the material world (the Seen): they needed garments and weapons provided by Sauron to give them form. Consequently, they could be defeated by attacks that destroyed their disguises, forcing them to return to Sauron to receive new ones.”

    http://tolkiengateway.net/wiki/Nazg%C3%BBl#Powers_and_Abilities

    “-no armor. thus completely invisible”

    Invisible to ordinary humans. Durza is by no means ordinary. He possesses superhuman senses that allow him to see in complete darkness, and detect sound frequencies that would slip by even the most attuned human’s ear. The slightest sound the Nazgul made would be picked up by Durza instantly. Add to that, Durza has very powerful psychic powers and can detect targets by their thoughts/minds/spirits even if he cannot see their physical bodies. These sorts of powers in the Inheritance Cycle have been used both as a technique to read and sense the nearby minds of others, and also as a sort of sonar that allows the psychic to feel/sense everything around them. The corrupting presence of the Nazgul would stand out to Durza like a beacon.

    “-intense fear aura, causing men to wet them selves and stand stricken dropping weapons and shields.”

    Durza knows no fear. Most of his mortal sensations and emotions, such as pain, were suppressed or eliminated by the emotionless spirits that guide him. He has been confronted by monsters, dragons, men with swords, Ra’zac(basically a biological version of the Nazgul, with a similar fear aura), dragonriders, elves, and powerful magicians without so much as flinching. At the end of “Eragon” when a dragon tore down the ceiling and came plummeting towards Durza, breathing fire with stone rubble raining down, Durza’s only reaction was to look surprised for a moment, then to sneer and attack her with magic.

    Furthermore, Durza’s mind is protected 24/7 by “iron-hard” barriers of psychic energy that thwart any attempt to mess with his mind. If a Nazgul attempted to use a supernatural fear aura on him, the only result would be Durza being alerted to the Nazgul’s presence. The pressure of something attempting to influence his mind would be instantly noticeable to him even if he wasn’t even paying attention.

    “-invisible blades that will kill you and turn you into a wraith.”

    You do realize that attempting to turn Durza into a wraith would be pointless, don’t you? It would be like trying to kill a fish by drowning it in a bathtub. Durza is already practically a wraith; his body is merely a vessal for a much more powerful being, which is by no means his spirit’s only dock-point in the world. If his physical body was destroyed or fatally corrupted, Durza could ditch it whenever he wants and rebuild an even stronger body to fight again.(He actually did this in the first book.) And with several potent spirits chained to Durza’s soul, corrupting it into a wraith would hardly be an easy proposition.

    “-three of the 9 are powerful sorcerers”

    Congratulations to those three, they now have an even ground to something that Durza has in all of his incarnations, powerful sorcery. God(or should I say Illuvatar?) help the Nazgul if it’s ‘just’ one of the warriors facing Durza.

  • Sapper007
    November 24, 2009
    #13

    bah… not by a long shot…
    Durza okay durza has a magic sword… so what? Is it designed to kill wraith’s?
    I can give you a list of weapons that are very powerful and magical that still cannot hurt the Nazgul….
    look, Middle earth has several weapons that can hurt ghosts and spirits that are still ineffective against wraiths… and magic in orders of excess than Durza were unable to hurt the nazgul, so unless you come up with specific reference to his weapon hurting a wraith… he can never EVER win this.

  • Pondering Fool
    November 24, 2009
    #14

    Sorry for the re-post, just wanted to get credit for the post for my collection of meaningless stars…..

    Finally, it seems that the site is working again. I admit, I am not a great person with technology, so could someone enlighten me what the problem was yesterday?

    Anyway, who ever requested this match, I congratulate you. Personally, I am leaning towards Durza (which is no argument, I know) out of favoritism. I know the Nazgul are wraiths, but was their physical abilities (while wearing armor), above that of a man? I guess, what I am trying to ask, did they have superior speed/strength/reaction time, compared to that of a man? Thanks to all who answer the question of a mad man.

    - the pondering fool

    The comment table in the database became corrupt so that had to be restored. Good times. – Admin

  • ss
    November 24, 2009
    #15

    ok, i thought we were talking about the witch king, we need 2 decide which 1 we are talking about to know who will win

  • Pondering Fool
    November 24, 2009
    #16

    “The comment table in the database became corrupt so that had to be restored. Good times. – Admin”

    Oh, that probably wasn’t fun. Thanks for actually replying mate (another reason I like this site so much.)

    “ok, i thought we were talking about the witch king, we need 2 decide which 1 we are talking about to know who will win”

    I agree. Is this going to be the Witch King vs. Durza, or a regular Nazgul vs. Durza? I don’t think it changes the battle as much. Doesn’t the Witch King differ from the Nazgul, because of the prophecy Glorfindel made about him in the 2nd age? Besides that, isn’t he stuck between death and life just like the others?

    - the pondering fool

  • Sapper007
    November 24, 2009
    #17

    Okay there were the Warriors and the Sorcerers and the three black kings of Numenor(one is the Witch king) so… which one does the nazgul get… I can debate any of them

    @Admin,
    which one does the Nazgul get…

    Let’s make it the Witch King – Admin

  • Sapper007
    November 24, 2009
    #18

    @PF
    The witch king fled weathertop for two reasons… 1 was the blade Merry had… 2 was he was confident in the poison blade killing frodo and bringing him under as a servant of the Dark Lord…

    And Big G being all that he is, isnt a god… close and blessed by gods… so His assumptions and prophecies do not actually logically come out to be hard truth… the Westernesse people made blades to kill the wraiths… but they were destroyed in the Second Age…. Glorfindel witnessed this… but the weapons where buried and forgotten… it is by happenstance (as Tolkien put it) that a hobbit had come arcross this barrow blade, so his prediction rang true… but the invunriblity is shared by the Nazgul, but not the whole “killed by man” thing….

  • w2drs21
    November 24, 2009
    #19

    I to think a nazgul would win. as sapper stated they cant be hurt by normal weapons only weapons designed to harm them. And sapper thank you very much for stating that you don’t need a non male to kill a ringwraith just the right kind of weapon. it gets me so annoyed how people say that “oh the witchking is weak because he got killed by a hobbit.

  • AHEM
    November 24, 2009
    #20

    “As far as my brief reshearch reveals, the Shade is essentially a human vessel to an otherwordly spirit, turning both into a third type of being. I am unsure whether or not this means Shades are unliving.”

    The mind and soul of the sorcerer who joined with the spirits remains tied to the form of the Shade in some way, as they still possess all of their human memories and some aspect of their personalities remains. However, their bodies themselves are merely constructs created by magic. They can move and interact with physical objects the way a human being would(albeit with great supernatural strength and speed), but underneath that human coating, there is only “swirling patterns of darkness.” The body is expendable, and doesn’t seem to require food, drink, sleep, or feel pain.(The one exception seems to be when their spirits themselves are damaged or leave their bodies, which always causes a Shade immense anguish as their spirt is separated from their constructed flesh.)

    “look, Middle earth has several weapons that can hurt ghosts and spirits that are still ineffective against wraiths… and magic in orders of excess than Durza were unable to hurt the nazgul, so unless you come up with specific reference to his weapon hurting a wraith… he can never EVER win this.”

    Like I said before, Durza’s magic has affected spiritual beings with no corporeal form before. That’s pretty much the whole point of sorcery. I don’t what else is needed.

    How do you expect me to prove that he can explicitly hurt a wraith? Do you think that when the book was written the author thoughtfully provided was information as to how a Shade’s magic/weapons would interact with a specific kind of spirit/wraith? “Wraiths” in the manner of the Nazgul don’t exist in the Inheritance Universe, so how they would interact with a Shade’s magic would contain a fair bit of hypothesis and speculation. All that can be said for certain is that Durza’s magic can and has affected spirits and incorporeal beings before. I find it riduculous to assume that since we have never seen him fight a wraith, we must assume that he would be unable to hurt it.

    Also, I’d like to refer to you what I said just a few posts ago as to the invulnerability of the Nazgul.

    “The Nazgûl existed mostly in the wraith world (the Unseen), making them extremely difficult to harm. Ordinary weapons would not hurt them, and even weapons of Númenórean manufacture would be destroyed if they passed through the wraith forms of the Nazgûl. They could not, however, interact normally with the material world (the Seen): they needed garments and weapons provided by Sauron to give them form. Consequently, they could be defeated by attacks that destroyed their disguises, forcing them to return to Sauron to receive new ones.”

    Are these disguises immune to all damage that can’t hurt wraiths? Even if we assume that Durza’s magic cannot touch the wraith form of the Nazgul, despite the instances we’ve seen of him dominating and enslaving spiritual entities that cannot be hurt by mortal weapons, he would still have a physical entity to target his attacks at. Unless these disguises are impervious to harm as well, I don’t see how Durza could fail to damage them.

  • John Laserbeams
    November 24, 2009
    #21

    I’m going to go with Durza out of favoritism.

  • Matapiojo
    November 24, 2009
    #22

    Thanks for the answer, AHEM. However, that still leaves the question fairly open. Can the shade be categorized as a magical construct or an undead?

  • Captain Epic
    November 24, 2009
    #23

    I want to say Durza, but I don’t even see how he can hurta Nazgul. As Sapper points out he has no wepons(to my knowlege) that could finish it off.

  • Pondering Fool
    November 24, 2009
    #24

    “Thanks for the answer, AHEM. However, that still leaves the question fairly open. Can the shade be categorized as a magical construct or an undead?”

    Well, the physical host never died per say, before the spirits took hold of his body? A possessed mortal? It is through sorcery (I believe, correct me if I am wrong), that a Shade is able to come into being (by overpowering the sorcerer and taking over his/her body). I would lean towards magical/possessed being…..

    - the pondering fool

  • Anti_Halo_Fan_Boy
    November 25, 2009
    #25

    The prophesy that the nazgul cannot die by the hand of man is false.
    The original one was saying that the witch king WILL die by someone that is not of man, but he mistook it as he couldn’t not die

  • Sapper007
    November 25, 2009
    #26

    So Admin has spoken at post 17…

    This Battle is now-
    .
    __–~*The Witch King of Angmar vs Durza*~–___
    .

    So now I quote the book Return of the King

    This is a passage from pellenor fields battle

    ” passed the sword of the Barrow-downs, work of Westernesse. But glad would he have been to know its fate who wrought it slowly long ago in the North-kingdom when the Dúnedain were young, and chief among their foes was the dread realm of Angmar and its sorcerer king. No other blade, not though mightier hands had wielded it, would have dealt that foe a wound so bitter, cleaving the undead flesh, breaking the spell that knit his unseen sinews to his will.”

    These blades of the Westernesse were crafted to specifically harm wraiths when the Numenor battled the Witch King in the middle of the second Age…

    Proof again that the witch king or his other nazgul were impervious to weapons not designed to hurt them….

    and the shade need only be stabbed in the heart?

    Witch king for the win

  • AHEM
    November 25, 2009
    #27

    “Thanks for the answer, AHEM. However, that still leaves the question fairly open. Can the shade be categorized as a magical construct or an undead?”

    Hmm, that’s a pretty complex train of thought. This will be a long explanation.

    Technically, the mortal host never died; they were merely possessed. Technically, their body isn’t dead. The books don’t really go in-depth on the biology of Shade bodies, but they seem to be made out of organic flesh to an extent. Think of it like the Terminator: it appears human on the surface, with human flesh, but under that layer of tissue is something wholly inhuman doing all the work.

    Durza was disembodied in “Eragon” and left as a spirit, but by the end of the book, he recreated a duplicate of his first body that looked exactly the same. On the other hand, another Shade(Varaug) was created in “Brisingr” and his human body instantly became a Shade’s body when the transformation was complete. This implies to me that a mortal body can be altered and assimilated to form a Shade’s body, but that a Shade is also capable of creating a layer of human tissue to dock its spirit in without any immediate materials to work with.

    All a Shade really needs to be a Shade is it’s spirit. The mind, powers, magic, and power source of the Shade all comes from its spiritual essence, and the body is just what it needs to walk around and interact with the physical world. When a Shade’s body is destroyed, they exist in spirit form for the interval between bodies.

    All in all, I would say that a Shade is a spirit that drives a construct, not undead. Either that, or they are a vaguely “living” mortal sorcerer with a heavily altered organic body who can survive the death of their body and make a new one if necessary. It would be a stretch to call them undead, because their original human soul never left their body, and that body never really died. I suppose you could interpret them as a dead body being being animated, preserved, and moved around by an outside force, but that seems a little ridiculous to me when the original soul is still there, helping to move the body. I would agree with PF and lean towards a magical/possessed being.

  • Pondering Fool
    November 27, 2009
    #28

    @Sapper

    My good friend, I fear you are breaking the no limits fallacy rule mate.

    “No Limit Fallacies
    The no limits fallacy is the illogical idea that a poorly understood phenomena can be extrapolated to infinity or assumed to not have any maximum value or threshold.

    For a gross example, observing that a shield can easily withstand an attack from a particular weapon, one might illogically conclude that the shield could withstand fire from an unlimited number of those weapons at the same time, or that it could withstand fire from a similar weapon that was much more powerful.

    For example, Darkseid has stated that no can stand up to his Omega Beams, which he emits from his eyes, but when in actuality, Superman, and other certain characters have withstood his OE, which proves his statement to be false.

    Or that only those of the Uchiha clan who have the ability to use the Mangekyo Sharingan can stop Itachi, or any other high class Sharingan user.”

    (Credit to Matapiojo [I believe?] or Admin)

    Sure, the Witch King (and the other Wraiths) could only be harmed by weapons designed in “their” universe. But that does not mean, weapons not designed to solely to defeat Lord of the Rings’s Wraiths, will not work on them. Sure, Durza still needs a pretty damn powerful weapon to work on a Wraith, but it is still possible for him to harm the wraith.

    - the pondering fool

  • AHEM
    November 27, 2009
    #29

    “Sure, the Witch King (and the other Wraiths) could only be harmed by weapons designed in “their” universe. But that does not mean, weapons not designed to solely to defeat Lord of the Rings’s Wraiths, will not work on them. Sure, Durza still needs a pretty damn powerful weapon to work on a Wraith, but it is still possible for him to harm the wraith.”

    Yes, exactly.

    One thing to keep in mind is that when it is said that “no weapons but these could harm the Witch King so” that statement is inside the Lord of the Rings universe, where the only weapons and powers available are LotR gear. While there isn’t really anything else in Arda that could destroy a Nazgul so easily, things might change a bit when other universes are brought into play. By the very nature of the interaction, fighting a character from another fictional universe will take into account things that do not exist in LotR, and would not have been available for analysis when the in-universe character/source stated that there aren’t any other weapons that can harm the wraiths. In a gross example, I would find it hard to accept that someone with the Infinity Gauntlet couldn’t defeat the Witch King just because they don’t have one of these specific weapons designed against him.

    It would be reasonable to take into account that Nazgul are impervious to most forms of harm and factor that huge defense in, but when they’re facing supernatural opponents who possess a wide range of powers and access to a very versatile magic system that can do almost anything depending on how it is combined, the chances of the Nazgul’s great defense being breached in some way are much higher, especially given that all of them(even the Witch King) are docked to the world by physical anchors that are not nearly as indestructible as they are.

  • Matapiojo
    November 28, 2009
    #30

    “and the shade need only be stabbed in the heart?

    Witch king for the win”

    Not that I wholly agree with his take on the exclusivity of the weapons needed to harm a Nazgul, but I agree with his take on the outcome. Regardless of No-Limit elements being taken into account, the ring wraiths seem to be a lot more resilient than the shades if all it takes to eliminate one is a heart-strike. The Witch King is quite a proficient combatant that we have seen possessing numerous magical counters and wards in addition to his martial skills.

    I think the Witch King takes it for sure.

  • AHEM
    November 30, 2009
    #31

    “Not that I wholly agree with his take on the exclusivity of the weapons needed to harm a Nazgul, but I agree with his take on the outcome. Regardless of No-Limit elements being taken into account, the ring wraiths seem to be a lot more resilient than the shades if all it takes to eliminate one is a heart-strike. The Witch King is quite a proficient combatant that we have seen possessing numerous magical counters and wards in addition to his martial skills.

    I think the Witch King takes it for sure.”

    Like I said in the very first post on this thread, I don’t think Durza has what it takes to win against the Lord of the Nazgul himself. While I think he could destroy one of the lesser Nazgul with his magic. While Durza is extremely tough and resilient normally, able to resist all forms of death except a heart-strike, his weakness would be more apparent than the Witch King’s. The WK’s weakness is about the application of specific weapons to any part of him, while Durza’s is about applying any weapon to a specific part of him. His only hope would really be to survive the Witch King’s attacks and rebuild his body several times, hoping that his weakness isn’t found, but I wouldn’t put my money on him. A fairer match up between LotR and Inheritance would have been Durza vs. one of the sorcerer Ringwraiths, or Murtagh Morzansson vs. the Witch King.

  • Sapper007
    December 2, 2009
    #32

    The Witch King of Angmar will utterly destroy… Destroy Durza… so at best Durza could warp the world to avoid the nazgul… big deal… the nazgul requires nothing to keep hunting him… sleep, food, water…. the Witch King would tirelessly hunt him down…

    So we break it down in to stats
    Martial Skill-
    Durza 4 Nazgul 9
    Nazgul have been fighting for thousands of years…
    Magical Skill-
    Durza 9 Nazgul 6
    Nazgul have been effective in casting counterspells to the Demigod wizards of middle earth…
    Magical Resistance-
    Durza ? Nazgul 9 have resisted spells for thousands of years…
    Survivability -
    Durza 8 Nazgul 9
    stab to the heart vs stab with a wraith slayer weapon…

    so… long story short… Durza could delay the confrontation for years and years…. but it would eventually come… and even if he did find a wraith slaying weapon… he wouldnt have the martial skill to kill the wraith before he dies….

  • AHEM
    December 2, 2009
    #33

    “the nazgul requires nothing to keep hunting him… sleep, food, water…. the Witch King would tirelessly hunt him down…”

    Shades do not require such upkeep either.

    “So we break it down in to stats
    Martial Skill-
    Durza 4 Nazgul 9
    Nazgul have been fighting for thousands of years…”

    While I would agree that Nazgul have much more experience and would have the advantage over Durza, his martial skill would be much, MUCH higher than a 4. Have you seen this guy fight? He’s made mockeries of master swordsman, defeated Eragon(the hero of Inheritance) with ease, matched against elves, etc. And his incredible reflexes only bolster his enormous prowess even further.

    He’s an excerpt from the first book, where Eragon crosses blades with Durza. Keep in mind that Eragon has at this point progressed to the level one would call an expert/master, and has surpassed his mentor, the swordmaster Brom, in skill.

    “Though he had trained with a master of the blade, Brom, and with Murtagh, who was also a deadly swordsman, he had never been this outclassed. The Shade was ‘playing’ with him.”-Eragon, book I of the Inheritance Cycle, chapter “Fighting Shadows”, page 306.

    “Magical Skill-
    Durza 9 Nazgul 6
    Nazgul have been effective in casting counterspells to the Demigod wizards of middle earth…”

    I agree mostly with this one, though the actual numbers would depend on the Nazgul. It would be decisively for Durza against one of the five non-sorcerer Ringwraiths, about even against one of the sorcerers, and probably an advantage for the Nazgul against the Witch King.

    “Magical Resistance-
    Durza ? Nazgul 9 have resisted spells for thousands of years…”

    Durza has a very high magical resistance. He has the ability to erect “wards” around himself that stop any attack, even magical ones, except attacks from weapons that are themselves magic-resistant. These barriers will hold up as long as Durza’s innate magic(which is much stronger than the best human sorcerers’) holds up, though it is drained a little each time. I will agree, however, that Nazgul are clearly quite resilient to magic and would be a formidable match.

    “Survivability -
    Durza 8 Nazgul 9
    stab to the heart vs stab with a wraith slayer weapon…”

    I agree with this, at least if it is the Witch King Durza is against. Against a weaker Nazgul there would be additional options to using a “wraith-slayer” weapon, as ordinary Nazgul, while extremely resilient, can be destroyed if their physical disguises are.

    “so… long story short… Durza could delay the confrontation for years and years…. but it would eventually come… and even if he did find a wraith slaying weapon… he wouldnt have the martial skill to kill the wraith before he dies….”

    Since this is the Witch King, I’m not really going to argue that Durza could beat him, but if Durza did find a wraith slaying weapon, I think his chances of victory would increase dramatically. With his super-human speed and mastery of the blade, he could possibly stealth attack the Witch King or even match him in close combat. Even a blow from a Hobbit with a weapon he is weak to was able to cripple the Witch-King severely. If Durza gets one(I don’t believe that this will come into play) I would lean towards him for the victory.

  • Sapper007
    December 4, 2009
    #34

    “While I would agree that Nazgul have much more experience and would have the advantage over Durza, his martial skill would be much, MUCH higher than a 4. Have you seen this guy fight? He’s made mockeries of master swordsman, defeated Eragon(the hero of Inheritance) with ease, matched against elves, etc. And his incredible reflexes only bolster his enormous prowess even further.”

    Wasn’t Eragon a kid at the time… and 1 month or so of swordtraining is hardly similiar to 1000′s of years of training…
    and Brom was busted and old…

    “I agree mostly with this one, though the actual numbers would depend on the Nazgul. It would be decisively for Durza against one of the five non-sorcerer Ringwraiths, about even against one of the sorcerers, and probably an advantage for the Nazgul against the Witch King.”

    Except the witch king was the most powerful fighter and sorcerer of the 9…

    “I agree with this, at least if it is the Witch King Durza is against. Against a weaker Nazgul there would be additional options to using a “wraith-slayer” weapon, as ordinary Nazgul, while extremely resilient, can be destroyed if their physical disguises are”

    Um what??? no… where does it say this? Because all nazgul and even their lesser wights(wights in Tolkien Lore are much different than D&D wights) are of the same type of wraith being and thats why the Westernesse had such a hard time killing them… the wights that is they never did kill a nazgul… in the hundred or so years they warred with them…

    “With his super-human speed and mastery of the blade, he could possibly stealth attack the Witch King or even match him in close combat. Even a blow from a Hobbit with a weapon he is weak to was able to cripple the Witch-King severely. If Durza gets one(I don’t believe that this will come into play) I would lean towards him for the victory.”

    The Nazgul as they are feel no pain… but when he was stabbed with the barrow blade it brought his human(ish) body from the other realm and caused the Witch king pain… getting stabbed is a painful thing… so yeah… he’s going to be crippled at least for a few seconds…. more than enough time to monologue and kill him… but still… the Witchking is still invisible… so that makes the stabbing a little more difficult… remember Armor was only worn to do Saurons bidding…

  • AHEM
    December 4, 2009
    #35

    “Wasn’t Eragon a kid at the time… and 1 month or so of swordtraining is hardly similiar to 1000’s of years of training…
    and Brom was busted and old…”

    Did you even read the books?

    Eragon had spent an extensive amount of time under Brom until he was declared a “Master of the Blade” and was able to defeat him. In addition, his abilities as a Dragon Rider caused him to learn and progress at a rate faster than any human. He trained for a lot longer than a month.(The narrative doesn’t say exactly how long.)

    Even if you want to make the argument that Brom was “busted and old” there still remains the fact that Eragon was able to stalemate Murtagh, who was a master swordsman, at the peak of his physical condition, and claimed to have studied swordplay all of his life.

    “Except the witch king was the most powerful fighter and sorcerer of the 9…”

    And like I said, he would have the biggest advantage against Durza as compared to any of the others.

    “Um what??? no… where does it say this?”

    I provided a link in post #12.

  • VaderTime
    December 7, 2009
    #36

    any nazgul would kick durza’s A$$.

  • Sapper007
    December 7, 2009
    #37

    “I agree with this, at least if it is the Witch King Durza is against. Against a weaker Nazgul there would be additional options to using a “wraith-slayer” weapon, as ordinary Nazgul, while extremely resilient, can be destroyed if their physical disguises are”

    I know where you got this quote and its untrue… there are several instances where the nazgul influence the”seen” world despite being completely invisible and not “disguised” and able to reap havoc on the Numenor….

    most good info comes from unfinished tales or the appendices….

    (note- i have been trying to correct tolkiengateway but they seem, arrogant and rude about being corrected)

  • AHEM
    December 8, 2009
    #38

    “I know where you got this quote and its untrue… there are several instances where the nazgul influence the”seen” world despite being completely invisible and not ‘disguised’ and able to reap havoc on the Numenor….”

    That complicates things, as it indicates that there is a dispute, even outside this match, as to the extent of the Nazgul’s powers.

  • sapper007
    December 10, 2009
    #39

    “That complicates things, as it indicates that there is a dispute, even outside this match, as to the extent of the Nazgul’s powers.”

    hardly… it just means who ever posted to the Tolkiengateway wiki doesnt know how to read properly… or do research…
    regardless on the above… you misrepresented that if their “disguises are destroyed, they are” which isnt the case at all,
    it speculation that you can kill them by destroying their ring… but its never been proven or even alluded to more than once,
    its known that if you kill them with a weapon designed to kill wraiths… it works…,
    but there has never been mention that if you destroy their clothes they die… thats silly… dont try to con Durza’s way out of this loss…

  • sapper007
    December 10, 2009
    #40

    hmm… I think i just wrapped up the last possibility of defeat for the Witch King…. say Durza has a weapon that can harm the nazgul…. and raises it to kill him…

    Then…

    “On October 20, the five Nazgul were rejoined by the other four. They pursued Frodo to the Ford of Bruinen. Glorfindel’s horse Asfaloth bore Frodo across the river, but Frodo felt compelled to stop. The Nazgul commanded him to give up the Ring, but Frodo refused, saying, “By Elbereth and Luthien the Fair, you shall have neither the Ring nor me!” (FotR, p. 226-7) The Witch-king advanced into the river and raised his hand. Frodo’s sword broke and he could not speak.”

    just change Frodo to Durza….

    The Witchking of Angmar FTW

  • Matapiojo
    December 10, 2009
    #41

    “just change Frodo to Durza….

    The Witchking of Angmar FTW”

    Wait, that argument too is full of speculation.

    First, we know not wheter the compelling is indeed a “global” spell, or if it’s an side-effect of a ringbearer being commanded by the lord of the Nazgul. For all we know that could be an isolated effect for the ringbearer of the One Ring.

    Second, the power to shatter a magical weapon is still arguable. We see him shattering the white staff in the movie (a mighty feat indeed), but was that event taken directly from the novels, or was it something Jackson and his team cooked up for the film?

    If there is no such event on the pages of the books, then it could be argued that the shattering spell/effect couldn’t work on magical weapons such as “Wraith-slayers”.

  • sapper007
    December 10, 2009
    #42

    “If there is no such event on the pages of the books, then it could be argued that the shattering spell/effect couldn’t work on magical weapons such as “Wraith-slayers”.

    except the weapon was a wraith slayer…
    (Paraphrased:)
    “The Witch-king advanced on Frodo with a sword and a Morgul-knife. Frodo slashed the Witch-king’s robe with his sword and invoked the name of Elbereth, one of the Valar, and the Witch-king cried out at the sound of her name. He stabbed Frodo in the shoulder with his Morgul-knife and a sliver of the blade broke off in Frodo’s shoulder and began working its way to his heart. Although the sliver was later removed, the wound continued to trouble Frodo for as long as he remained in Middle-earth.”

    The Witch-king also recognized that Frodo’s sword from the Barrow-downs had been made by the Dundedain for the war against Angmar. He knew that the blow that had narrowly missed him would have been deadly to him.

  • Matapiojo
    December 10, 2009
    #43

    “except the weapon was a wraith slayer…”

    Ah, fair enough.

  • AHEM
    December 10, 2009
    #44

    Well, like I said in the beginning(again), I never really thought that Durza could best the Lord of the Nazgul. I think him against a regular Nazgul would be a much more fair fight, but not the Witch King.

  • sapper007
    December 10, 2009
    #45

    good… I nominate The Witch-King for the FP award… in less than 50 posts… woot…

  • Forward Unto Dawn
    December 13, 2009
    #46

    I know it’s a common exaggeration to say “no man can kill me” but does Durza count as a man? because while Eowyn can kill Nazugul, Eowyn does not necessarily have a higher killing effectiveness than a man.
    Grrr… MAGIC!
    Someone answer?

  • sapper007
    December 14, 2009
    #47

    does it matter? The quote was never meant as a tell all on how to kill the Witch King moron…

    Glorfindel
    “Far off yet is his doom, and not by the hand of man will he fall”
    The Lord of the Rings
    Appendix A I (iv), Gondor and the Heirs of Anárion

    and it wasnt Eowyn “skills” or “magic” that killed him… it was the blade of the Westernesse that Tom Bombadil gave the hobbits from the barrow downs… a weapon that was made to kill Nazgul… Merry stabbed him with it…
    while im not going to ask you to do a little research before you post… because you wouldnt be able to piece anything together that even remotely resembled an intuitive arguement… but at least read the other posts before parading around like a complete idiot

  • Matapiojo
    December 14, 2009
    #48

    Ouch.

    That’s harsh.

    Not undeserving, but still harsh.

  • AHEM
    December 14, 2009
    #49

    “I know it’s a common exaggeration to say “no man can kill me” but does Durza count as a man?”

    Maybe. Durza was born a human male, but after becoming a Shade, he was mutated and was no longer a pureblood member of his race, and it is highly doubtful that he retained the ability to reproduce in a male fashion.

    But then, I consider debating whether the opponent is a man or not when fighting the Witch King to be inconsequential, since the Witch King isn’t really “immune” in any special way to men. The prophecy, given inside the LotR universe, simply states that death by a man is not what will happen in his history in Middle-Earth.

  • sapper007
    December 14, 2009
    #50

    “But then, I consider debating whether the opponent is a man or not when fighting the Witch King to be inconsequential, since the Witch King isn’t really “immune” in any special way to men. The prophecy, given inside the LotR universe, simply states that death by a man is not what will happen in his history in Middle-Earth.”

    or

    Glorfindel
    “Far off yet is his doom, and not by the hand of man will he fall”
    The Lord of the Rings
    Appendix A I (iv), Gondor and the Heirs of Anárion

  • AHEM
    December 14, 2009
    #51

    “while im not going to ask you to do a little research before you post… because you wouldnt be able to piece anything together that even remotely resembled an intuitive arguement… but at least read the other posts before parading around like a complete idiot”

    I get the feeling that Sapper007 is an intense fan of the LotR. The idea of the Witch King losing or anyone here getting information from the books wrong really seems to put him in an ugly mood.

  • AHEM
    December 14, 2009
    #52

    “Glorfindel
    ‘Far off yet is his doom, and not by the hand of man will he fall’
    The Lord of the Rings
    Appendix A I (iv), Gondor and the Heirs of Anárion”

    Not the key phrase: “Not by the hand of man WILL he fall,” not “not by the hand of man CAN he fall.”

  • sapper007
    December 14, 2009
    #53

    @Ahem, a note on that and me… and my irritation…
    1. the movies, while very nice and all(especially when talking in graphics) hardly represent the books…
    2. the books pretty much spawned all fantasy writing then on out… so a little respect is order, especially if you like said genre
    3. The information is out there… in various wikis and such… i have only gone to
    my books 2 or three times to double check info… so there is no excuse for this jackassery

  • AHEM
    December 14, 2009
    #54

    “1. the movies, while very nice and all(especially when talking in graphics) hardly represent the books…”

    When did I mention something from the movies that wasn’t in the books and use that as a basis for an argument? I don’t recall doing so.

    “2. the books pretty much spawned all fantasy writing then on out… so a little respect is order, especially if you like said genre”

    I am well aware of the influence that the Lord of the Rings has had on the fantasy genre and on fiction in general, as any contemporary reader of fantasy is; in fact, I personally consider it one of the best and most influential series in the entire genre.

    I really don’t understand where you’re coming from; are you explaining why you like LotR so much, or are you insinuating that I’m somehow “disrespecting” Tolkien’s work because I’m not automatically throwing my support to the character from LotR?

    Really, I’m fine with it if you really like/respect LotR, I do too, I just don’t think it should get in the way of these debates. This is Durza vs. Nazgul, after all, not the Inheritance Cycle vs. Lord of the Rings as literature.

  • Matapiojo
    December 14, 2009
    #55

    “This is Durza vs. Nazgul, after all, not the Inheritance Cycle vs. Lord of the Rings as literature.”

    UNIVERSE FIGHT!!!

    Get on it, Admin.

  • Zervziel
    December 14, 2009
    #56

    Considering to kill a Shade all that’s needed is to stab their heart, I think the Naz’gul can accomplish this.

  • sapper007
    December 14, 2009
    #57

    I was talking about the halo fanboy… slow your roll ahem…

  • AHEM
    December 14, 2009
    #58

    “I was talking about the halo fanboy… slow your roll ahem…”

    The Halo fanboy? Who? I haven’t noticed anyone mention Halo so far. I apologize if I mistook a comment directed at someone else as something meant for myself, but it was kind of confusing, with my name at the beginning of your post . . .

    “UNIVERSE FIGHT!!!

    Get on it, Admin.”

    Hmm, Alagaesia against Arda. Come to think of it, that would make a pretty epic fantasy battle. I think I’ll request that one too.

  • Mazrim
    December 14, 2009
    #59

    “Considering to kill a Shade all that’s needed is to stab their heart, I think the Nazgul can accomplish this.”
    Back up…you are making it sound like stabbing Durza in the heart is child’s play. This guy can teleport himself, use major magic, and is an expert at swordmanship. I agree that Durza could kill a regular Nazgul, but would probably lose to the Witch King. However, I cannot think of a battle with the Witch King with the opponent being skilled in swordsmanship (and using his/her sword). Sure Aragon, blinded them with fire in Weathertop, and Gandalf drove away their mounts, but did they ever fight with swords for more than a few seconds? I’m not sure if we know enough about the Witch King’s sword skills to be able to tell if he would be able to best Durza with his Morgul Blade. I’d still give the match to the Witch King though.
    I wonder how Durza would fair against the Nazgul second in command (can’t remember the name)…

  • sapper007
    December 15, 2009
    #60

    ” but did they ever fight with swords for more than a few seconds?”

    I think so… but i cant be sure… since they are multi THOUSAND years old. and were the greatest warriors of the second age… but i doubt they used swords for longer than a second…

    /facepalm

  • AHEM
    December 15, 2009
    #61

    “Back up…you are making it sound like stabbing Durza in the heart is child’s play. This guy can teleport himself, use major magic, and is an expert at swordmanship.”

    Good point. I’d like everyone to emphasize on what he just said: stabbing Durza is not as easy as it looks. Sure, it is a more readily exposed weakness than the Witch King’s, but that doesn’t mean that it is an easy proposition to do, or that Durza is just going to sit there and let you take a shot at his heart, which he knows his is strategic weakpoint. In addition to his great skill and magic, Durza also has supernatural speed and strength, and often wears armor in battle to protect his vulnerable chest.

    Nazgul are formidable warriors and definitely have the advantage in experience, but Durza would be by no means an easy opponent to best in physical combat.

  • Mazrim
    December 15, 2009
    #62

    ” but did they ever fight with swords for more than a few seconds?”

    “I think so… but i cant be sure… since they are multi THOUSAND years old. and were the greatest warriors of the second age… but i doubt they used swords for longer than a second…”

    What I meant by that post, Sapper 007, is do we have a recorded example by Tolkien of the Witch King fighting a very skilled opponent, someone like Aragon, Gandalf, or Elrond (or even someone lke Faramir or or Eomer) so that we can compare his skills to Durza’s to see if he has what it takes to beat him and stab him in the heart?

  • sapper007
    December 16, 2009
    #63

    Yes… the witch king lead the war of Angmar against the Numenorians of old… and eradicated them… leaving small pockets of their race… and he beat ass on aragorn on weather top… just off the top of my head…

  • AHEM
    December 16, 2009
    #64

    “Yes… the witch king lead the war of Angmar against the Numenorians of old… and eradicated them… leaving small pockets of their race… and he beat ass on aragorn on weather top… just off the top of my head…”

    Weathertop didn’t really end very well for the Nazgul, as they failed to capture Frodo, were resisted, and fled. But then, wasn’t the Witch King there just an avatar or weaker version of him, not at full power?

  • sapper007
    December 16, 2009
    #65

    Yeah, i meant King Arveleg I but wrote Aragorn… and several battles happened on weathertop… but yeah… long story short… witchking beats up Aragorn, stabs frodo… reconizes the the blades of the westernesse and decides its better to not hang around… and since frodo was supposed to become a wraith soon… under his command… its best to lose nothing and leave…
    but now that i think about it gandalf did some battle with them there as well…

  • Mazrim
    December 16, 2009
    #66

    “Yeah, i meant King Arveleg I but wrote Aragorn… and several battles happened on weathertop… but yeah… long story short… witchking beats up Aragorn, stabs frodo… reconizes the the blades of the westernesse and decides its better to not hang around… and since frodo was supposed to become a wraith soon… under his command… its best to lose nothing and leave…”

    Wait a minute…you are making Weathertop sound like a victory for the Witch King. Its been ten years since I read the books, so I won’t claim to be an expert on Nazgul, but from what I remember, they were after the ring, not Frodo, and left Weathertop kind of Ringless… Yes, Frodo was probably going to become a Wraith, but Aragon was protecting him, and they were pretty darn close to Rivendell and elves who could heal him. I know you really like the Witch King sapper007, but even he had some losses to go along with his many victories (was he present when Dol Guldur was destroyed?)

    “the witch king lead the war of Angmar against the Numenorians of old… and eradicated them… leaving small pockets of their race…”
    And yes, he did obliberate Arnor, but not without a gigantic army behind him…

  • sapper007
    December 17, 2009
    #67

    okay,
    witch king & nazgul fight gandalf on weathertop… gandalf flees at dawn when the other Nazgul dont see well…
    few days later same scenario but with hobbits and aragorn… after kicking gandalfs ass earlier… and now fighting aragorn, plus having already stabbed frodo… the the other nazgul dip out because of firebrands… and decide that since the hobbits have weapons that can kill them… its best not to hang around and fight with the Dunedain king… so they chase frodo but where stopped by Glorfindel… if i have to explain why Glorfindel is a bad ass your no longer allowed to comment on this thread…

  • AHEM
    December 17, 2009
    #68

    *Sigh* You can always rely on a LotR character to complicate a debate with confusing information about powers and feats. . .

  • Mazrim
    December 17, 2009
    #69

    “if i have to explain why Glorfindel is a bad ass your no longer allowed to comment on this thread…”
    Yes, I know Glorifendel is very powerful, and second only to Elrond in Rivendell, named after the ancient elf who slew a Balrog. Also, it has been 10 years since I read LotR, so I am a little rusty on some of the Nazgul’s feats. I recently got a Tolkien Encyclopedia to refresh myself. But sapper 007, not everybody is as total an expert on The Lord of the Rings as you are, so please do not get angry if we post incorrect information or ask questions.
    By the way, there had been a lot of posts that Durza will not be able to kill the Witch King because he does not have a magical blade that can kill him. That would make it impossible for Durza to win, so can we just assume he has one of the blades or perhaps has conjured up a magical blade powerful enough to hurt the Nazgul?

  • sapper007
    December 18, 2009
    #70

    actually tolkien is pretty clear through his notes that Glorfindel from the first age is the same person as Glorfindel from the third…

    and I will not and cannot decide that… and thats a little one sided… nazgul are “supposedly” very easy to kill once cut with a blade of the westernesse… so… if that nerf bat is swung, then i would like to see “no magic” nerfing the shade… kind of unfair…

  • Mazrim
    December 18, 2009
    #71

    “and I will not and cannot decide that… and thats a little one sided… nazgul are “supposedly” very easy to kill once cut with a blade of the westernesse… so… if that nerf bat is swung, then i would like to see “no magic” nerfing the shade… kind of unfair…”
    Alright, I did not know what a disadvantage that would be for the Witch King, but if we are not going to get anywhere if Durza cannot kill him. I know you are a huge LotR fan, but we need to give Durza some chance of winning this Duel, else there is no point.
    However, if you would still argure against it, this might very well turn into a standstill. Each can neutralize many of the other’s powers, and neither is human, neither has to eat or even gets tired. Shades are experts in bladework, and so are Nazgul, so they would probably be dueling until the end of time, or Rand al’Thor shows up and blasts them both with balefire…

  • sapper007
    December 18, 2009
    #72

    The witch king on some occasions has shattered weapons… Frodo had a blade
    of the westernesse at the Ford and had it shattered and gandalf the white had his
    staff shattered at minas tirith, so its a moot point to give the shade a
    weapon that could kill him anyways…
    but thats the fun of these debates, learn more about characters you didnt know about

  • Matapiojo
    December 18, 2009
    #73

    “but thats the fun of these debates, learn more about characters you didnt know about”

    Agreed.

  • AHEM
    December 18, 2009
    #74

    “However, if you would still argure against it, this might very well turn into a standstill. Each can neutralize many of the other’s powers, and neither is human, neither has to eat or even gets tired. Shades are experts in bladework, and so are Nazgul, so they would probably be dueling until the end of time, or Rand al’Thor shows up and blasts them both with balefire…”

    That seems a pretty likely scenario. It will most likely go on for a long while, until either the Nazgul figures out to stab Durza in the heart and gets past his deadly swordsmanship(shattering his sword might help), or Durza devises some use of magic that can permanently hurt the Nazgul.

    Since it is the Witch King, the greatest of all Nazgul, that we’re talking about, I’m leaning towards him. I’d be more inclined for a stalemate or even a victory for Durza against one of the others, but the Witch King is one of the most formidable beings from LotR and could probably best Durza just on power, even without his incredible durability brought into play.

  • Mazrim
    December 18, 2009
    #75

    “It will most likely go on for a long while, until either the Nazgul figures out to stab Durza in the heart and gets past his deadly swordsmanship(shattering his sword might help), or Durza devises some use of magic that can permanently hurt the Nazgul.”
    Someone like Durza would conjure up a magic sword if his was shattered, something even the Nazgul cannot do…

    “Since it is the Witch King, the greatest of all Nazgul, that we’re talking about, I’m leaning towards him. I’d be more inclined for a stalemate or even a victory for Durza against one of the others, but the Witch King is one of the most formidable beings from LotR and could probably best Durza just on power, even without his incredible durability brought into play.”
    As much as I like Durza, the Witch King would probably win this fight, but it would take him a very, very, very long time. I’m guessing Sauron or Galbatorix would call their minion back for some other evil deed before they finished this.

  • AHEM
    December 20, 2009
    #76

    I just remembered another ability that might help Durza.

    Inheritance mages can turn invisible if they want. This might help to cancel out any stealth advantage the Witch King might take using his Wraith nature, and if he is limited to having to wear armor and thus be visible, it could give Durza an edge that would prolong this fight.

  • Mazrim
    December 20, 2009
    #77

    Hey…what about the twelve instant death spells from the Inheritance Cycle Universe? Ringwraiths are not exactly alive, but not exactly dead either, so they should still be affected. There must be some reason Durza never used it on Eragon, but I cannot think of it. Whatever the reason, the Ringwraiths probably could not duplicate it. Think of it…The Witch King of Angmar dead because of a single word….

  • AHEM
    December 20, 2009
    #78

    “Hey…what about the twelve instant death spells from the Inheritance Cycle Universe? Ringwraiths are not exactly alive, but not exactly dead either, so they should still be affected. There must be some reason Durza never used it on Eragon, but I cannot think of it. Whatever the reason, the Ringwraiths probably could not duplicate it. Think of it…The Witch King of Angmar dead because of a single word….”

    It’s an elegant thought, but I don’t think the twelve words of death would be very effective against a wraith. According to Oromis, the premise of the death words is to cause infinitesimal damage to vital organs, such as arteries in the heart or brain or the severing of essential nerves, that cause the target’s body to fail. While they are very efficient in dispatching organic opponents with little energy loss for the spellcaster, a wraith probably wouldn’t have any noticeable organs to strike. Also, since the death words are very small and precise uses of magic, they are quite easy to block, which is why they are pretty much useless against more powerful spellcasters such as Eragon; wards can deflect them with no problem. Against an enemy as resistant as the Witch King, they would likely be ineffective.

  • John Anen
    January 2, 2010
    #79

    Well since this is the Witch King who is nearly invincible and resistant to magic I have to go with him. Isn’t Durza like the “Inheritance” equivalent of Saruman or something?

  • AHEM
    January 4, 2010
    #80

    “Well since this is the Witch King who is nearly invincible and resistant to magic I have to go with him. Isn’t Durza like the “Inheritance” equivalent of Saruman or something?”

    Come to think of it . . . yeah, Durza is kind of similar to Saruman, in function at least. The equivalent of the Witch King would probably be Murtagh Morzansson.

  • Sapper007
    January 11, 2010
    #81

    Enough… The Nazgul for the win….

  • John Anen
    January 12, 2010
    #82

    “Enough… The Nazgul for the win….”

    Yeah since this is the Witch King and the strongest of the Nazgul the victory should go to him. Factpile Award for the Lord of the Nazgul.

  • AHEM
    January 12, 2010
    #83

    “Factpile Award for the Lord of the Nazgul.”

    I second.

  • Sapper007
    January 12, 2010
    #84

    good both sides agree…

    Witch King FTW…

  • Matapiojo
    January 12, 2010
    #85

    “Factpile Award for the Lord of the Nazgul.”

    I third.

  • Mazrim
    January 14, 2010
    #86

    “Factpile Award for the Lord of the Nazgul.”

    Alright. I’ve tried to argue a few points for the Shade, and I still argue he could beat a regular Nazgul and tie with Khamul, but against the Witch King of Angmar he will probably meet his demise. I’ll fourth the Factpile Award for the Witch King.

  • sapper007
    February 9, 2010
    #87

    Lets get the award already!

  • johnnyquest
    February 12, 2010
    #88

    “or Rand al’Thor shows up and blasts them both with balefire…”

    ROFL wow… I was actually reading all the posts and thinking of posting that exact same comment. Yea, victory goes to Rand al’Thor… even though this duel has absolutely nothing at all to do with him.

  • Pondering Fool
    February 19, 2010
    #89

    “Factpile Award for the Lord of the Nazgul.”
    I third.”

    I fourth? Is that even a legitimate statement? Anyway, you mates get the point….

    - pondering fool

  • sapper007
    February 22, 2010
    #90

    YAY FOR NAZGUL!!! peanut butter jelly time! /dances around/

  • AHEM
    February 28, 2010
    #91

    “YAY FOR NAZGUL!!! peanut butter jelly time! /dances around/”

    /Backs away very slowly. . .

Leave a Reply:



By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution. Please try to keep the language on the clean side - for the most part, you can say what you want and use an * instead of a key vowel, and we'll know what you meant to say. Thanks!


«   |   »
Categories
Heads Up Recent Posts Latest Comments Most Popular Topics