AT-ST Vs Tau Hammerhead Gunship

admin

June 27th, 2009 at 1:20 am -

Not sure how much the AT-ST has a chance in this match in any given scenario. Just about any terrain the Hammerhead has the advantage. So, is there any scenario where the AT-ST can win?

Rate This Post:

27 Comments

PaPPa JUDAS
June 27, 2009
#1

How is this not a one shot kill for the Hammerhead?
Space marine
June 27, 2009
#2

I don’t know JUDAS, I don’t know…
chewie6000
June 27, 2009
#3

So, is there any scenario where the AT-ST can win?-no theres not. Simple.
Locutus
June 27, 2009
#4

AT-ST loses badly. The advanced Imperial “armor” won’t save it. The thing explodes when it falls over for Emperor’s sake.
Rise Up
June 27, 2009
#5

AT-ST will get rammed and be destroyed lmao.
PaPPa JUDAS
June 27, 2009
#6

If they miss the first shot then it will be a two shot kill
Jon
June 27, 2009
#7

What are the dimensions of the Hammerhead?
If its wider than an AT-ST, then an AT-ST could win in a room with a low indestructible ceiling and a forest of indestructible pillars that creates gaps so that an AT-ST can maneuver but a Hammerhead (and its turret) can’t.
Basically, a situation in which the Hammerhead can’t move or bring its weapons to bear but an AT-ST can…

But such a scenario is highly unlikely so the Tau win.
L-W
June 28, 2009
#8

Who decided to pit a Main Battle Tank against a Scout transport? You may as well put a Humvee against an M1 Abrams for crying out loud?
chewie6000
June 28, 2009
#9

c’mon give the gunship the award… and perhaps another one for shortest fight ever? I don’t know but its possible.
Kenny C.
June 28, 2009
#10

I don’t see how this is even fair…. one universe’s most advanced tank vs. a fucking unbalanced walker that can de defeated with catapults.
Belisaurius
June 29, 2009
#11

That implies that the AT-ST is atleast as maneuverable as the hammerhead.

No contest here
Matapiojo
June 29, 2009
#12

This is just fiction abuse. In no way, shape, or form is this even remotely close to fair.
chewie6000
June 29, 2009
#13

So I think an award is due, there has been no -wait there can be no defense of how the at-st could win.
Sean0931
June 29, 2009
#14

Why not have a sentinel vs an At-St, they’re pretty much the same thing.
x on
June 29, 2009
#15

@sean
We’ve done that.
chewie6000
June 29, 2009
#16

who won in the sentinel AT-ST fight? link?
sangheli
June 30, 2009
#17

If the gunship deployed the gundrones it had than that might be remotely fair any other scenario no chance.
Matapiojo
July 1, 2009
#18

@chewie6000

We have not had that match, we had one similar:
http://www.factpile.com/at-pt-vs-imperial-guard-sentinel

I’m sure that an AT-ST would have a considerable advantage over any Sentinel pattern. However, feel free to make the Battle Request or go to the Alternate Battles section of the Forums.
chewie6000
July 1, 2009
#19

thanks, Mata and I think I may suggest it.
lobster man 3000
July 8, 2009
#20

Yea, this is pretty straight bad news for AT-ST. Hammerhead wins.
Space marine
July 8, 2009
#21

http://www.factpile.com/at-pt-vs-imperial-guard-sentinel

God I was an ass there
Matapiojo
July 8, 2009
#22

“God I was an ass there ”

We live, we learn, we grow. If we all looked for our early posts, we will most likely see them as less than favorable.
Belisaurius
July 8, 2009
#23

In your defence, you were an eighth grader.

everyone is stupid at some point in their life.
i dunno
August 2, 2009
#24

the tanks of the god emperors imperium have trouble dealing with hammerheads

a sentinal wannabe has no chance.

railgun=win
burst cannons= smaller win
pg14
August 3, 2009
#25

wow thats sad the at-st’s have lazers so its like a sentinel with twin mounted lasguns vs the tau hammerhead gunship with like what 7in. wide rail gun, gun drones and more speed, armour, firepower, and manourability, lol.
Tom
October 22, 2009
#26

Errr… falling/ swingin log>>> AT-ST.
ZomBninjasamurai
November 4, 2009
#27

seriously an ST against a battle tank this isn’t fair at all